Donald G. Moranville, Appellant,v.Bill Richardson, Secretary, Department of Energy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 23, 1998
05970639 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 23, 1998)

05970639

11-23-1998

Donald G. Moranville, Appellant, v. Bill Richardson, Secretary, Department of Energy, Agency.


Donald G. Moranville v. Department of Energy

05970639

November 23, 1998

Donald G. Moranville, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Request No. 05970639

) Appeal No. 01964771

Bill Richardson, ) Agency No. 94(95)WAPA

Secretary, )

Department of Energy, )

Agency. )

)

DENIAL OF REQUEST TO RECONSIDER

On March 25, 1997, Donald G. Moranville, (hereinafter referred to

as appellant) timely initiated a request to the Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission (Commission) to reconsider the decision in Donald

G. Moranville v. Federico Pena, Secretary, Department of Energy, EEOC

Appeal No. 01964771 (February 24, 1997). EEOC regulations provide that

the Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous decision.

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a). The party requesting reconsideration must submit

written argument or evidence which tends to establish one or more of

the following three criteria: new and material evidence is available

that was not readily available when the previous decision was issued,

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(1); the previous decision involved an erroneous

interpretation of law, regulation, or material fact, or a misapplication

of established policy, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(2); and the decision is of

such exceptional nature as to have substantial precedential implications,

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(3).

After a review of the appellant's request for reconsideration, the

agency's response thereto, the previous decision, and the entire record,

the Commission finds that appellant's request fails to meet the criteria

of 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c), and it is the decision of the Commission

to deny appellant's request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01964771

(February 24, 1997) remains the Commission's final decision. The agency

shall comply with the order of the previous decision as clarified

below.<1> There is no further right of administrative appeal from a

decision of the Commission on this request for reconsideration.

ORDER (E1092)

The agency is ORDERED to provide appellant with EEO counseling concerning

the new allegation of discrimination he has raised herein and to process

the remanded allegation in accordance with 29 C.F.R. �1614.105 et

seq. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant that it has received

the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar days of the date

the agency receives this decision. The agency shall issue to appellant

a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant of the

appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the

date the agency receives this decision, unless the matter is otherwise

resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision

without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty

(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgement to appellant and a copy

of the correspondence that transmits the investigative file and notice

of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The

agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report

shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the

appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the

appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29

C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right to file a civil

action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or

following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. ��

1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the appellant has the

right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance

with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for enforcement or a civil

action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in

42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the appellant files a civil

action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any

petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (Q0993)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision in part, but it also

requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action

in an appropriate United States District Court on both that portion of

your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion of the

complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative processing.

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT

IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

NOV 23, 1998

Date Frances M. Hart

Executive Officer

Executive Secretariat

1The order has been clarified to direct the agency to initially provide

appellant with EEO counseling on his new allegation that the agency

discriminatorily failed to select him for a GS-13 Safety and Security

Manager position. For the purposes of determining the timeliness of

appellant's EEO counselor contact, the agency shall utilize May 4, 1996,

the date that appellant first raised this issue with the agency.