Donald Estes, Complainant,v.Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 12, 2005
01a54402 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 12, 2005)

01a54402

09-12-2005

Donald Estes, Complainant, v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security Agency.


Donald Estes v. Department of Homeland Security

01A54402

September 12, 2005

.

Donald Estes,

Complainant,

v.

Michael Chertoff,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A54402

Agency No. HS-05-0576

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated April 28, 2005, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. In his

complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination

on the basis of sex (male) when:

On November 8, 2004, the Chief of Testing, Evaluation and Analysis Branch

of the Research and Evaluation Division sent an e-mail to everyone in

the Research and Evaluation Division, accusing complainant of being

"unprofessional, discourteous, and inflammatory" in his distribution of

e-mail messages to that division.

On November 8, 2004, the Chief sent complainant an e-mail stating that

she would meet with the Branch Chief of Employee Labor Relations, if

complainant continued to send her unprofessional e-mail messages.

On November 9, 2004, complainant met with the Chief and his Division

Chief and requested an apology and retraction from the Chief and

she allegedly screamed that she would not apologize or comply with

complainant's request.

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the

EEOC regulations because complainant failed to show that he suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for

which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Complainant has not presented

evidence to show that he was subjected to any adverse action with

respects to a term, condition or privilege of employment as a result of

the Chief's e-mail messages or her refusal to apologize. Additionally,

complainant's complaint on a whole is insufficient to state a claim

of harassment. Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 12, 2005

__________________

Date