Dohrmann Hotel Supply Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Nov 15, 1946

71 N.L.R.B. 699 (N.L.R.B. 1946)

In the Matter of DOHRMANN HOTEL SUPPLY COMPANY (MANUFAC-
TURING DIvISION), EMPLOYER and WAREHOUSEMEN'S UNION LOCAL
860, AFL, PETITIONER
Case No. 90-R-1802.-Decided November 15, 1946
Messrs. John R. Cummings and Bruce,Dohrmann, of San Francisco,
Calif., for the Employer.
Tobriner ct Lazarus, by Mr. Albert Brundage, of San Francisco,
Calif., and Messrs. Marls J. Reilly and J''ohn.McBride, both of San
Francisco, Calif., for the Petitioner.
Messrs. Dominic Gallo, Tony Kosloslcy, and Julius Rosenthal, all
of San Francisco, Calif., for the CIO.
Cllr. A. Sumner Lawrence, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
Upon a petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at San
Francisco, California, on July 23, 1946, before Louis R. Mercado,
hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are
free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.
Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations
Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER
Dohrmann Hotel Supply Company, a Nevada corporation, is en-
gaged in the manufacture, sale, distribution, and installation of hotel
and restaurant equipment and supplies at various locations in the
western part of the United States. In connection with its business,
the Employer operates sundry sales, manufacturing, and warehouse
facilities throughout the area covered by its operations. Only the
warehouse operations at its facilities in San Francisco and Oakland,
California, are involved in these proceedings. During the past year,
the Employer purchased materials and supplies valued in excess of
71 N L R. B, No 114.
699
700 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
$200,000, of which approximately 30 percent was shipped to its plants
in the San Francisco area from points outside the State of California.
The Employer does not deny and we find that it is engaged in
commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
The Petitioner is a labor organization affiliated with the American
Federation of Labor , claiming to represent employees of the Employer.
Local 1-6, International Longshoremen 's and Warehousemen's
Union, CIO , herein called the CIO , is a labor organization affiliated
with the Congress of Industrial Organizations , claiming to represent
employees of the Employer.
III. THE QUESTLON CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
The Employer refuses to recognize either the Petitioner or the
CIO as the exclusive bargaining representative of employees of the
Employer until one or the other of such organizations has been certi-
fied by the Board in an appropriate unit.
The CIO contends that its present closed-shop contract with the
Employer as member of an employer association is a bar to the
present proceeding. In support of its contention, the CIO asserts
that the contract, the scope of which is governed by earlier agree-
ments negotiated by the predecessor in interest of the CIO, is appli-
cable to the warehouse employees sought to be represented by the
Petitioner in the present proceeding. The Petitioner, on the other
hand, maintains that the contract is inapplicable to the present group
of employees and is therefore not a bar to the proceeding.
The record discloses that the contract in question is limited in
coverage to "employees engaged in classifications, house by house,
covered by former agreements." So far as the Employer is concerned,
the only former agreement relevant to the present Issue is an agree-
ment executed in 1937 covering all warehouse employees at the then
existing facilities of the Employer In the San Francisco area. There
is, however, no specific provision in this agreement which would make
the agreement applicable to plants which might thereafter be estab-
lished by the Employer. The agreement has, moreover, never been
applied by the Employer or the contracting union to the warehouse
employees in the plant herein concerned, which was established by
the Employer in 1941, 3 years prior to the termination of such agree-
ment. Similarly, the existing CIO contract executed, on June 1,
1944, and admittedly only a continuation of the original agreement,
has never been applied by either party to the present group of ware-
house employees who apparently have been without representation
DOHRNIANN HOTEL SUPPLY COMPANY 701
throughout the period covered by the existing contract and were not
members of any labor organization until shortly before the filing of
the petition in the present proceeding.
In view of the foregoing facts , we are of the opinion that at the
time the 1944 contract was executed , the contracting parties intended
that it should cover only those employees for whom the predecessor
in interest of the CIO had bargained , namely, the warehouse em-
ployees of the Employer at its facilities which existed at the date of
the original 1937 agreement .' Accordingly, we find that the existing
CIO contract is not a bar to the present proceeding . Moreover, as-
suming arguendo that the present CIO contract was intended to cover
warehouse employees at plants established by the Employer after
1937,2 since there is nothing in the record to indicate that the con-
tract in question has ever been applied in any respect to the ware-
house employees herein concerned , or that the latter have participated
in the negotiation of the 1944 contract or otherwise have ever had
an opportunity to express for themselves their desires with respect
to being included under the terms of such contract , we are of the
opinion that the contract would not constitute a bar to a present
investigation and determination of representatives.'
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Employer within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and ( 7) of the Act;
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT; THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
The Petitioner contends that all persons employed at the Employ-
er's 8th Street plant who are employed as warehousemen, issue clerks,
shipping and receiving clerks, excluding truck drivers, sheet motal
workers,4 office workers and all supervisory einployees,b constitute an
appropriate unit. The CIO contends that only a multiple-plant unit
comprising all warehouse employees of the Employer at both its 8th
' See Matter of Sydney Thomas Corporation, 58 N. L. R B 51 ; Matter of Universal
Pictures Company, Inc, 61 N L. R. B. 1001 ; of Matter of Santiam Lumber Co , 71 N L.
R. 13 5
2 The CIO argues that its failure to apply the contract in question to the present group
of warehouse employees was occasioned not by its belief that the contract was inapplicable
to such employees, but by its ignorance of the fact that the Employer had established a new
plant employing warehouse employees. There is, however, evidence in the record from
which it may be inferred that the CIO has long known of the establishment by the Ein-
ployer of the plant herein concerned.
i See Matter of American Warming d Ventilating Co., 38 N. L. R B. 515 ; Matter of Chase
Brass & Copper Co , Inc, 47 N L. R B 298.
' Sheet metal workers are presently represented by the Sheet Metal workers Union which
has a collective bargaining agreement with the Employer.
" All parties agreed at the hearing that two subforemen who have authority to recom-
mend the hire and discharge of employees should be excluded from any unit which the
Bond mac find appropriate
702 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Street plant and at its Mission Street store 6 constitute an appropriate
unit. The Employer takes no position and requests that the Board
determine the question of the appropriate unit.
The record reveals that, although the operations of the 8th Street
plant and the Mission Street store are integrated and are under the
same over-all supervision, the warehouse employees at the 8th Street
plant are carried on a separate pay roll, are not frequently inter-
changed with -those at the Mission Street store,' and are under the
local supervision of two supervisory employees whose recommenda-
tions regarding change of status are relied upon by the supervisor
in charge of plant operations. As previously indicated, the ware-
house employees at the 8th Street plant have not been members of or
actively represented by any labor organization throughout the period
covered by the existing CIO contract, and also have never had an
opportunity to determine for themselves whether they desire to be
represented in an association-wide warehousemen's unit coextensive
with the Employer's operations in this area. Under the circum-
stances, including the fact that these employees have not been cov-
ered, at least in practice, by either of the exclusive bargaining con-
tracts applicable to the other warehouse employees of the Employer,
we are of the opinion that the present group of warehouse employees
might properly constitute a separate appropriate unit or be merged
in a unit including other warehouse employees of the Employer,
depending upon the results of a self-determinative election.8
In the absence of a question concerning representation of the- Em-
ployer's other warehouse employees, we shall direct an election to
determine whether the warehouse employees at the 8th Street plant
desire to be represented separately for collective bargaining purposes
apart from other warehouse employees of the Employer. Upon the
results of this election will depend, in part, our determination of the
appropriate unit. If a majority of the 8th Street plant warehouse
employees select the AFL they will be taken to have indicated their
desire to constitute a separate bargaining unit; if a majority of those
participating in the election select the CIO, they will be taken to have
indicated their desire to become a part of the unit presently repre-
sented by the CIO and may be bargained for as part of such unit.
We shall direct an election in the following voting group : All
persons employed by the Employer at its 8th Street, San Francisco
plant, as warehousemen, including issue clerks, shipping and receiving
6 The iNarehouse employees at the Mission Street store are covered by the existing con-
tract between the Employer and the CIO.
7Although a few interchanges occurred during , the recent war period , there is at present
no general practice of interchanging warehouse employees between the 8th Street plant
and the -fission Street store
8 See Matter of D T Williams Valve Company, 59 N I, R B 1206 ; Matter of Bercut-
Richards Packinq Company, et at , 68 N L R B 005
DOHRMANN HOTEL SUPPLY COMPANY 703
clerks, but excluding truck drivers , sheet metal workers, office em-
ployees, and all supervisory employees with authority to hire, pro-
mote, discharge , discipline , or otherwise effect changes in the status
of employees , or effectively recommend such action.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the
purposes of collective bargaining with Dohrmann Hotel Supply Com-
pany ( Manufacturing Division ), San Francisco , California , an elec-
tion by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not
later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the
direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Twentieth
Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations
Board, and subject to Sections 203.55 and 203.56, of National Labor
Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 4, among the em-
ployees in the voting group referred to in Section IV, above, who were
employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date
of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said
pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily
laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United
States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding
those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and
have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to
determine whether they desire to be represented by Warehousemen's
Union Local 860, AFL, or by Warehouse Union Local 6, I. L. W. U.,
CIO, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither.
717734-47-vol 71-46