Dodge Printing, LLC

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Aug 27, 2009

354 NLRB No. 67 (N.L.R.B. 2009)

354 NLRB No. 67
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
Dodge Printing, LLC and Local 259-M, Graphic
Communications Conference, International
Brotherhood of Teamsters. Case 3–CA–27068
August 26, 2009
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN LIEBMAN AND MEMBER SCHAUMBER
The General Counsel seeks a default judgment in this
case on the ground that the Respondent has failed to file
an answer to the consolidated complaint and compliance
specification. On a charge and an amended charge filed
by the Union on March 10 and April 24, 2009, respec-
tively, the General Counsel issued the complaint on April
29, 2009, against Dodge Printing, LLC (the Respondent),
alleging that it has violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the
Act. Thereafter, on May 12, 2009, the General Counsel
issued the compliance specification and order consolidat-
ing complaint and compliance specification and notice of
hearing. The Respondent failed to file an answer to the
complaint or the consolidated complaint and compliance
specification.
On June 26, 2009, the General Counsel filed a Motion
for Default Judgment with the Board. Thereafter, on
June 29, 2009, the Board issued an order transferring the
proceeding to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause
why the motion should not be granted. The Respondent
filed no response. The allegations in the motion are
therefore undisputed.
Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment1
Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations
provides that the allegations in the complaint shall be
deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days
from service of the complaint, unless good cause is

1 Effective midnight December 28, 2007, Members Liebman,
Schaumber, Kirsanow, and Walsh delegated to Members Liebman,
Schaumber, and Kirsanow, as a three-member group, all of the Board’s
powers in anticipation of the expiration of the terms of Members Kir-
sanow and Walsh on December 31, 2007. Pursuant to this delegation,
Chairman Liebman and Member Schaumber constitute a quorum of the
three-member group. As a quorum, they have the authority to issue
decisions and orders in unfair labor practice and representation cases.
See Sec. 3(b) of the Act. See Snell Island SNF LLC v. NLRB, 568 F.3d
410 (2d Cir. 2009); New Process Steel v. NLRB, 564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir.
2009), petition for cert. filed 77 U.S.L.W. 3670 (U.S. May 22, 2009)
(No. 08-1457); Northeastern Land Services v. NLRB, 560 F.3d 36 (1st
Cir. 2009), rehearing denied No. 08-1878 (May 20, 2009). But see
Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. NLRB, 564 F.3d 469
(D.C. Cir. 2009), petitions for rehearing denied Nos. 08-1162, 08-1214
(July 1, 2009).
shown. Similarly, Section 102.56 of the Board’s Rules
and Regulations provides that the allegations in a com-
pliance specification will be taken as true if an answer is
not filed within 21 days from service of the compliance
specification. In addition, the consolidated complaint
and compliance specification affirmatively stated that
unless an answer was filed by June 2, 2009, all the alle-
gations in the consolidated complaint and compliance
specification could be considered admitted. Further, the
undisputed allegations in the General Counsel’s motion
disclose that the Region, by letter dated June 5, 2009,
notified the Respondent that unless an answer was re-
ceived by June 12, 2009, a motion for default judgment
would be filed. Nevertheless, the Respondent failed to
file an answer.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail-
ure to file an answer, we grant the General Counsel’s
Motion for Default Judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation,
with an office and place of business located in Utica,
New York, has been engaged in the business of commer-
cial printing.
During the 12-month period preceding issuance of the
complaint, the Respondent, in conducting its business
operations described above, performed services valued in
excess of $50,000 in States other than the State of New
York.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act, and that the Union, Local 259-M, Graphic
Communications Conference, International Brotherhood
of Teamsters, is a labor organization within the meaning
of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
At all material times, the following individuals held
the positions set forth opposite their respective names
and have been supervisors of the Respondent within the
meaning of Section 2(11) of the Act and agents of the
Respondent within the meaning of Section 2(13) of the
Act:
Alan Goldberg Owner
John Wissing CEO
The following employees of the Respondent (the unit)
constitute a unit appropriate for purposes of collective
bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act:
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD2
All employees performing bargaining unit work of the
type described in Section 2 of the collective-bargaining
agreement between the Union and the Respondent, ef-
fective by its terms from April 1, 2006 through March
31, 2008, and extended from April 1, 2008 through
March 31, 2009.
At all material times, based on Section 9(a) of the Act,
the Union has been the designated exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the unit and has been recog-
nized as the representative by the Respondent. This rec-
ognition has been embodied in successive collective-
bargaining agreements, the most recent one of which is
described above.
About January 29, 2009, the Respondent closed its
Utica, New York facility.
The Respondent engaged in this conduct without prior
notice to the Union and without affording the Union an
opportunity to bargain with respect to the effects of this
conduct.
Since about January 29, 2009, the Respondent unilat-
erally failed to make severance payments to unit employ-
ees pursuant to section 19 of the collective-bargaining
agreement, and unilaterally failed to pay unit employees
their vacation accruals pursuant to section 12 of the col-
lective-bargaining agreement. The Respondent engaged
in this conduct without the Union’s consent.
The subjects set forth in the preceding paragraph relate
to wages, hours and other terms and conditions of em-
ployment of the unit and are mandatory subjects for the
purpose of collective bargaining.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the acts and conduct described above, the Respon-
dent has failed to bargain collectively and in good faith
with the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of
its employees in violation of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of
the Act. The Respondent’s unfair labor practices affect
commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of
the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(5)
and (1) by failing, since January 29, 2009, to make sev-
erance payments to unit employees pursuant to section
19 of the collective-bargaining agreement and pay unit
employees their vacation accruals pursuant to section 12
of the collective-bargaining agreement, we shall order
the Respondent to make unit employees whole by paying
them the amounts set forth in the compliance specifica-
tion, plus interest accrued to the date of payment as set
forth in New Horizon for the Retarded, 283 NLRB 1173
(1987),2 and minus tax withholdings required by Federal
and State laws.
To remedy the Respondent’s unlawful failure and re-
fusal to bargain with the Union with respect to the effects
of its decision to close its Utica, New York facility, we
shall order the Respondent to bargain with the Union, on
request, about the effects of that decision. As a result of
the Respondent’s unlawful conduct, however, the unit
employees have been denied an opportunity to bargain
through their collective-bargaining representative at a
time when the Respondent might still have been in need
of their services and a measure of balanced bargaining
power existed. Meaningful bargaining cannot be assured
until some measure of economic strength is restored to
the Union. A bargaining order alone, therefore, cannot
serve as an adequate remedy for the unfair labor practices
committed.
Accordingly, we deem it necessary, in order to ensure
that meaningful bargaining occurs and to effectuate the
policies of the Act, to accompany our bargaining order
with a limited backpay requirement designed to make
whole the unit employees for losses suffered as a result
of the violations and to recreate in some practicable
manner a situation in which the parties’ bargaining posi-
tion is not entirely devoid of economic consequences for
the Respondent. We shall do so by ordering the Respon-
dent to pay backpay to the unit employees in a manner
similar to that required in Transmarine Navigation
Corp., 170 NLRB 389 (1968), as clarified in Melody
Toyota, 325 NLRB 846 (1998).3
Thus, the Respondent shall pay its unit employees
backpay at the rate of their normal wages when last in the
Respondent’s employ from 5 business days after the date
of this Decision and Order until the occurrence of the
earliest of the following conditions: (1) the date the Re-
spondent bargains to agreement with the Union on those
subjects pertaining to the effects of the closing its facility
on unit employees; (2) a bona fide impasse in bargaining;
(3) the Union’s failure to request bargaining within 5
business days after receipt of this Decision and Order, or
to commence negotiations within 5 business days after
receipt of the Respondent’s notice of its desire to bargain

2 In the consolidated complaint and consolidated specification, the
General Counsel seeks compound interest computed on a quarterly
basis for any monetary awards. Having duly considered the matter, we
are not prepared at this time to deviate from our current practice of
assessing simple interest. See, e.g., Glen Rock Ham, 352 NLRB 516
fn. 1 (2008), citing Rogers Corp., 344 NLRB 504 (2005).
3 See also Live Oak Skilled Care & Manor, 300 NLRB 1040 (1990).
DODGE PRINTING, LLC 3
with the Union; or (4) the Union’s subsequent failure to
bargain in good faith.
In no event shall the sum paid to these unit employees
exceed the amount they would have earned as wages
from the date on which the Respondent ceased doing
business at the facility to the time they secured equiva-
lent employment elsewhere, or the date on which the
Respondent shall have offered to bargain in good faith,
whichever occurs sooner. However, in no event shall
this sum be less than the unit employees would have
earned for a 2-week period at the rate of their normal
wages when last in the Respondent’s employ. Backpay
shall be based on earnings which the unit employees
would normally have received during the applicable pe-
riod, less any net interim earnings, and shall be computed
in accordance with F. W. Woolworth Co., 90 NLRB 289
(1950), with interest as prescribed in New Horizon for
the Retarded, supra.
Here, the General Counsel in the compliance specifica-
tion seeks the minimum of 2 weeks of backpay due the
unit employees under Transmarine, plus any additional
backpay that may be due depending upon bargaining
between the parties regarding the effects of the Respon-
dent’s decision to close its facility. Exhibits 1–4 of the
compliance specification set forth the amount due each
employee. As noted above, we shall grant the General
Counsel’s request and order the Respondent to pay those
amounts to the discriminatees, plus any additional back-
pay that may accrue to the earliest of the conditions set
forth in Transmarine, plus interest.
Further, in view of the fact that the Respondent’s facil-
ity is closed, we shall order the Respondent to mail a
copy of the attached notice to the Union and to the last
known addresses of its former unit employees in order to
inform them of the outcome of this proceeding.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Dodge Printing, LLC, Utica, New York, its
officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing and refusing to bargain collectively and in
good faith with Local 259-M, Graphic Communications
Conference, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, as
the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the
employees in the unit with respect to the effects on the
unit employees of its decision to close its Utica, New
York facility. The appropriate unit is:
All employees performing bargaining unit work of the
type described in Section 2 of the collective-bargaining
agreement between the Union and the Respondent, ef-
fective by its terms from April 1, 2006 through March
31, 2008, and was extended from April 1, 2008 through
March 31, 2009.
(b) Failing to make severance payments to unit em-
ployees pursuant to section 19 of the collective-
bargaining agreement and failing to pay unit employees
their vacation accruals pursuant to section 12 of the col-
lective-bargaining agreement.
(c) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, bargain with the Union concerning the
effects on unit employees of its decision to close its
Utica, New York facility, and reduce to writing and sign
any agreement reached as a result of such bargaining.
(b) Pay the individuals named below the amounts fol-
lowing their names, plus interest accrued to the date of
payment as set forth in New Horizon for the Retarded,
283 NLRB 1173 (1987), and minus tax withholdings
required by Federal and State laws:
EMPLOYEE
NAME VACATION SEVERANCE TRANSMARINE
Adamoschek,
Arthur $3,068.80 $1,534.40 $1,534.40
Armstrong, Gary $4,466.40 $1,488.80 $1,488.80
Billa, Donald $2,388.51 $1,300.99 $1,300.99
Burdick, Wendy $2,652.00 $1,060.80 $1,060.80
Davis, David $2,649.60 $1,152.00 $1,152.00
Decola, Anthony $3,078.00 $1,231.20 $1,231.20
Dzeravenets,
Aliaksan $1,161.60 $1,161.60 $1,161.60
Fischer, Vicky $1,280.40 $853.60 $853.60
Fitch, Matthew $1,128.80 $1,128.80 $1,128.80
Flagg, Robert $1,170.00 $936.00 $936.00
Georgia, James $6,240.00 $2,080.00 $2,080.00
Georgia, Jonathan $1,120.00 $1,120.00 $1,120.00
Graziano, Ronald $1,693.60 $1,693.60 $1,693.60
Gryziec, Ellamae - $758.40 $758.40
Harahliad, Yury $798.48 $887.20 $887.20
Ingraham, Garret $2,388.51 $1,300.99 $1,300.99
Kirilko, Pauel $921.60 $1,024.00 $1,024.00
Kukharchuk,
Leonty $1,591.44 $837.60 $837.60
Lanaux, John $3,088.00 $1,235.20 $1,235.20
Laurey, Marc $4,406.40 $1,468.80 $1,468.80
Lay, Soe $367.20 $734.40 $734.40
Lindig, Tammy $1,370.40 $913.60 $913.60
Macintosh, Don $2,772.00 $1,108.80 $1,108.80
Manella, Mark $6,387.04 $2,903.20 $2,903.20
Manning, Jeff $4,371.84 $1,821.60 $1,821.60
Markwardt, Fred $2,388.51 $1,300.99 $1,300.99
Marsden, Chris $2,233.20 $1,488.80 $1,488.80
Miller, Deserae $409.20 $818.40 $818.40
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD4
Miller, Jerry $2,388.51 $1,300.99 $1,300.99
Mariano, Robert $3,056.64 $1,273.60 $1,273.60
Morat, Sharon $2,561.28 $1,067.20 $1,067.20
Olsen, John $2,921.60 $1,460.80 $1,460.80
Panasyuk, Va-
leriy $2,695.68 $1,497.60 $1,497.60
Peters, Joe $6,264.00 $2,160.00 $2,160.00
Robbins, Donald $1,188.00 $1,188.00 $1,188.00
Robotham, James
Jr. $875.84 $1,251.20 $1,251.20
Schulze, George $4,010.00 $1,604.00 $1,604.00
Shepard, Louis $4,432.80 $1,477.60 $1,477.60
Shizo, Vyachesl $5,428.80 $1,809.60 $1,809.60
Skrgic-
Dizdarevic,
Emina $884.00 $884.00 $884.00
Stevens, Chris $293.12 $732.80 $732.80
Stevens, Kaleigh $897.60 $897.60 $897.60
Stevens, Morris $5,222.00 $1,492.00 $1,492.00
Stys, John $3,424.24 $1,488.80 $1,488.80
Tran, Sean $4,200.00 $1,680.00 $1,680.00
Verenich,
Grigory $3,090.00 $1,236.00 $1,236.00
TOTALS $119,425.64 $59,845.56 $59,845.56
TOTAL
BACKPAY
DUE: $239,116.76
(c) Pay to the unit employees their normal wages for
the period set forth in the remedy section of this decision.
(d) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, or such
additional time as the Regional Director may allow for
good cause shown, provide at a reasonable place desig-
nated by the Board or its agents, all payroll records, so-
cial security payment records, timecards, personnel re-
cords and reports, and all other records, including an
electronic copy of such records if stored in electronic
form, necessary to analyze the amount of backpay due
under the terms of this Order.
(e) Within 14 days after service by the Region, dupli-
cate and mail, at its own expense, and after being signed
by the Respondent’s authorized representative, copies of
the attached notice marked “Appendix”4 to the Union
and to all unit employees employed by the Respondent at
any time since January 29, 2009.
(f) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-

4 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Mailed by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Mailed Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board."
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. August 26, 2009
Wilma B. Liebman, Chairman
Peter C. Schaumber, Member
(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
MAILED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio-
lated Federal labor law and has ordered us to mail and obey
this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to bargain collectively and
in good faith with Local 259-M, Graphic Communica-
tions Conference, International Brotherhood of Team-
sters, as the exclusive collective-bargaining representa-
tive of the employees in the unit with respect to the ef-
fects on the unit employees of our decision to close our
Utica, New York facility. The appropriate unit is:
All employees performing bargaining unit work of the
type described in Section 2 of the collective-bargaining
agreement between the Union and us, effective by its
terms from April 1, 2006 through March 31, 2008, and
extended from April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2009.
WE WILL NOT fail to make severance payments to unit
employees pursuant to section 19 of the collective-
bargaining agreement and fail to pay unit employees
their vacation accruals pursuant to section 12 of the col-
lective-bargaining agreement.
DODGE PRINTING, LLC 5
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Union over the
effects on unit employees of our decision to close our
Utica, New York facility, and put in writing and sign any
agreement reached as a result of such bargaining.
WE WILL pay the individuals named below the amounts
following their names, plus interest accrued to the date of
payment, and minus tax withholdings required by Fed-
eral and State laws:
EMPLOYEE
NAME VACATION SEVERANCE TRANSMARINE
Adamoschek,
Arthur $3,068.80 $1,534.40 $1,534.40
Armstrong, Gary $4,466.40 $1,488.80 $1,488.80
Billa, Donald $2,388.51 $1,300.99 $1,300.99
Burdick, Wendy $2,652.00 $1,060.80 $1,060.80
Davis, David $2,649.60 $1,152.00 $1,152.00
Decola, Anthony $3,078.00 $1,231.20 $1,231.20
Dzeravenets,
Aliaksan $1,161.60 $1,161.60 $1,161.60
Fischer, Vicky $1,280.40 $853.60 $853.60
Fitch, Matthew $1,128.80 $1,128.80 $1,128.80
Flagg, Robert $1,170.00 $936.00 $936.00
Georgia, James $6,240.00 $2,080.00 $2,080.00
Georgia, Jonathan $1,120.00 $1,120.00 $1,120.00
Graziano, Ronald $1,693.60 $1,693.60 $1,693.60
Gryziec, Ellamae - $758.40 $758.40
Harahliad, Yury $798.48 $887.20 $887.20
Ingraham, Garret $2,388.51 $1,300.99 $1,300.99
Kirilko, Pauel $921.60 $1,024.00 $1,024.00
Kukharchuk,
Leonty $1,591.44 $837.60 $837.60
Lanaux, John $3,088.00 $1,235.20 $1,235.20
Laurey, Marc $4,406.40 $1,468.80 $1,468.80
Lay, Soe $367.20 $734.40 $734.40
Lindig, Tammy $1,370.40 $913.60 $913.60
Macintosh, Don $2,772.00 $1,108.80 $1,108.80
Manella, Mark $6,387.04 $2,903.20 $2,903.20
Manning, Jeff $4,371.84 $1,821.60 $1,821.60
Markwardt, Fred $2,388.51 $1,300.99 $1,300.99
Marsden, Chris $2,233.20 $1,488.80 $1,488.80
Miller, Deserae $409.20 $818.40 $818.40
Miller, Jerry $2,388.51 $1,300.99 $1,300.99
Mariano, Robert $3,056.64 $1,273.60 $1,273.60
Morat, Sharon $2,561.28 $1,067.20 $1,067.20
Olsen, John $2,921.60 $1,460.80 $1,460.80
Panasyuk, Va-
leriy $2,695.68 $1,497.60 $1,497.60
Peters, Joe $6,264.00 $2,160.00 $2,160.00
Robbins, Donald $1,188.00 $1,188.00 $1,188.00
Robotham, James
Jr. $875.84 $1,251.20 $1,251.20
Schulze, George $4,010.00 $1,604.00 $1,604.00
Shepard, Louis $4,432.80 $1,477.60 $1,477.60
Shizo, Vyachesl $5,428.80 $1,809.60 $1,809.60
Skrgic-
Dizdarevic,
Emina $884.00 $884.00 $884.00
Stevens, Chris $293.12 $732.80 $732.80
Stevens, Kaleigh $897.60 $897.60 $897.60
Stevens, Morris $5,222.00 $1,492.00 $1,492.00
Stys, John $3,424.24 $1,488.80 $1,488.80
Tran, Sean $4,200.00 $1,680.00 $1,680.00
Verenich,
Grigory $3,090.00 $1,236.00 $1,236.00
TOTALS $119,425.64 $59,845.56 $59,845.56
TOTAL
BACKPAY
DUE: $239,116.76
WE WILL pay our unit employees further limited back-
pay in connection with our failure to bargain over the
effects of our decision to close our Utica, New York fa-
cility, as required by the Decision and Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board.
DODGE PRINTING, LLC.