Diane E. Levasseur, Appellant,v.No. DON97-00024-005 John H. Dalton, Secretary, of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 8, 1998
01980896 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 8, 1998)

01980896

10-08-1998

Diane E. Levasseur, Appellant, v. No. DON97-00024-005 John H. Dalton, Secretary, of the Navy, Agency.


Diane E. Levasseur, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01980896 ) Agency

No. DON97-00024-005

John H. Dalton, )

Secretary, ) Department

of the Navy, )

Agency. )

_________________________________)

DECISION

Appellant filed an appeal with this Commission from a final decision of

the agency concerning her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of

1967, as amended (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. �621 et seq. The final decision was

issued on October 10, 1997. The appeal was postmarked November 7, 1997.

Accordingly, the appeal is timely (see 29 C.F.R. �1614.402(a)), and is

accepted in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960, as amended.

On August 12, 1997, appellant filed a formal complaint, alleging that

she was the victim of unlawful employment discrimination on the bases

of sex, age, and reprisal.

On October 10, 1997, the agency issued a final decision. Therein,

the agency determined that appellant's complaint was comprised of three

allegations, namely, whether appellant was subjected to discrimination

when her supervisor:

a. Called her into his office, on 20 September 1996, and told her that

she were disrupting the office.

b. Starting in later February 1997, failed to provide her with additional

work of a non-clerical nature to enable her to qualify for promotion as

compared to young white male employees . . . in other Branches in the

Logistics and Materials Division who were getting the work and being

promoted while females in the Government Furnished Materials Branch were

being assigned work that was clerical in nature.

c. Rated her Minimally Successful, level 2, on 10 July 1997.

The agency accepted allegations (b) and (c) for investigation. The agency

dismissed allegation (a) for failure to state a claim.

On appeal, appellant argues that allegation (a) is directly linked to

the matter raised in allegation (c). Appellant also submits a copy of

an e-mail message transmitted from appellant's Supervisor to a Second

Level Supervisor relating to the matter addressed in allegation (a).

In response, the agency argues that no disciplinary action was taken

against appellant as a result of the matter raised in allegation (a), and

that this allegation was properly dismissed for failure to state a claim.

The record in this case contains a copy of the e-mail message dated

September 25, 1996, from appellant's Supervisor to a Second Level

Supervisor. Therein, appellant's Supervisor made the following statement:

The purpose of this e-mail is to advise you and to make a record of my

conversation with [appellant and a co-worker] of 20 Sep 96. This record

is relative to complaints from several co-workers regarding conversations

between [appellant and the co-worker] held in each others work spaces.

Both [appellant and the co-worker] were advised that conversations

that are degrading to co-workers and management were inappropriate

in the workplace and that such conversations, especially considering

their frequency and duration had become a disruption to the workplace.

They were advised to discontinue such conversations.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a) provides that an agency may dismiss

a complaint which fails to state a claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.103.

For employees and applicants for employment, EEOC Regulation 29

C.F.R. �1614.103 provides that individual and class complaints of

employment discrimination prohibited by Title VII (discrimination on

the bases of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin), the ADEA

(discrimination on the basis of age when the aggrieved individual is

at least 40 years of age) and the Rehabilitation Act (discrimination

on the basis of disability) shall be processed in accordance with Part

1614 of the EEOC Regulations. In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court has

stated that an employee is aggrieved when some personal loss or harm

has been suffered with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of

employment. See Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 409

U.S. 205 (1972).

In allegation (a), appellant alleged that her Supervisor called her

into his office on September 20, 1996, and informed her that she was

disrupting the office. The agency argues that appellant was not the

subject of disciplinary action as a result of the discussion with her

Supervisor. We note, however, that the matter raised in allegation

(a) was memorialized in an e-mail message from appellant's Supervisor

to a Second Level Supervisor, on September 25, 1996; and that the

Supervisor stated in the e-mail message that its purpose was to "make

a record" of the Supervisor's conversation with appellant on September

20, 1996. Given the facts of this case, we find that allegation (a)

addresses an incident that has been recorded and could have a negative

impact on appellant's employment future. We therefore determine that

appellant is aggrieved and that she has stated a claim relating to the

issue addressed in allegation (a). Accordingly, the agency's decision

to dismiss allegation (a) was improper and is REVERSED. Allegation (a)

is REMANDED to the agency for further processing in accordance with this

decision and applicable regulations.

ORDER (E1092)

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegation in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant

that it has received the remanded allegation within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to

appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant

of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days

of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise

resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision

without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty

(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy

of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights

must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file

a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed

within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File

A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Oct. 8, 1998

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations