Dennis R. McElroy, Complainant,v.Elaine Chao, Secretary, Department of Labor, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 7, 2007
0120072464 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 7, 2007)

0120072464

09-07-2007

Dennis R. McElroy, Complainant, v. Elaine Chao, Secretary, Department of Labor, Agency.


Dennis R. McElroy,

Complainant,

v.

Elaine Chao,

Secretary,

Department of Labor,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120072464

Agency No. 0607030

Hearing No. 560-2007-00008X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's

appeal from the agency's March 23, 2007 final decision concerning

his equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging employment

discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment

Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. Complainant

alleged that the agency discriminated against him on the basis of age

(D.O.B. 02/27/58) when:

1. he was not selected for the position of GS-0343-13 Program Analyst

advertised under Vacancy Announcement Number MS-CKC-VE-05-169; and

2. he was not selected for the position of GS-0343-13 Program Analyst

advertised under Vacancy Announcement Number DE-CKC-VE-05-054.

Complainant was employed at the agency as an Assistant Director, Veterans

Employment and Training Service (ADVETS) (Veterans' Program Specialist),

at the agency's facility located in Jefferson City, Missouri. The record

reflects that the positions at issue in claims (1) and (2) were the same

position. Complainant was among the top two candidates; however, he was

not selected for the position. The selectee was considered to be the

better candidate due to his law degree, past experiences, and excellent

work ethic. Complainant makes numerous contentions, including among

other things, that the position did not require a law degree, that his

qualifications were clearly superior to the selectee's, and that there

were errors in the processing of the candidates. We find, however, that

complainant failed to establish that the agency's proffered reason for

not selecting him was a pretext for age discrimination. Complainant

has not shown that the disparities in qualifications between him and

the selectee are "of such weight and significance that no reasonable

person, in the exercise of impartial judgment, could have chosen the

[selectee] over [him] for the job in question." Ash v. Tyson Foods,

Inc., 190 Fed.Appx. 924, 88 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,608 (11th Cir. 2006),

cert. denied, 127 S.Ct. 1154 (Jan. 22, 2007). Therefore, we find that the

record reflects that complainant failed to establish, by a preponderance

of the evidence that he was discriminated against based on his age.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the agency's final decision

because the preponderance of the evidence of record does not establish

that discrimination occurred.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__9/07/07________________

Date

2

0120072464

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120072464