Denison Cotton Mill Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsSep 17, 194563 N.L.R.B. 929 (N.L.R.B. 1945) Copy Citation In the Matter of DENISON COTTON MILL COMPANY and UNITED TEXTILE WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL Case No. 16-R-13,58.-Decided September 17,1945 Samesels, Brown, Herman and Scott, by Mr. John M. Scott, of Fort Worth, Tex., for the Company. Mr. A. F. Codena, of San Antonio, Tex., for the Union. Miss Helen Hart, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon an amended petition duly filed by United Textile Workers of America, AFL, herein called the Union, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of em- ployees of Denison Cotton Mill Company, Denison, Texas, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due-notice before William J. Scott, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at Fort Worth, Texas, on July 10, 1945. The Company and the Union appeared,' participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross- examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from preju- dicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS . OF THE COMPANY Denison Cotton Mill Company, a Texas corporation, owns and oper- ates a mill in Denison, Texas, where it manufacturers cotton duck. Until June 1, 1945, all the Company's finished products were sold 3 Textile Workers Union of America , CIO, was served with Notice of Hearing but failed to appear. 63 N. L. R. 13., No. 147. 929 930 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD under contract to the War Department. Since that date, the Com- pany has sold goods to civilian customers only. From September 30,' 1944, until the time of the hearing, the Company manufactured fin- ished products valued at $1,567,651, of which 88 percent was trans- ported to points outside the State of Texas. The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. H. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED United Textile Workers of America, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Company has refused to grant recognition to the Union as the exclusive bargaining representative of certain of its employees until the Union has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. A statement of a Board agent, introduced into evidence at the hear- ing, indicates that the Union represents a substantial number of em- ployees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate 2 We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Company and the Union agree that a unit composed of all production and maintenance employees of the Company, including the watchman,3 but excluding office and clerical employees, foremen, and all other supervisory employees, is appropriate. However, the Union maintains that second hands are supervisory employes and, therefore,, should be excluded from the unit. The Company opposes the Union's position in this respect. The four second hands employed by the Company are, for the most part, assistant foremen. They aid the foremen of the various depart- ments, assisting in carrying out changes required in production,. making up pay rolls, and keeping time. If employees fail to perform their duties, second hands may report them to the foremen. -In the absence of the foremen, second hands may also excuse employees from 2 The Field Examiner reported that the Union . submitted 131 application and authoriza- tion cards, 119 of which bore apparently genuine, original signatures of employees listed on the Company ' s pay roll of May 13 , 1945, which contained the names of 217 employees in the alleged appropriate unit; and that 6 cards were dated May 1945, 110 were dated April 1945, and 3 were undated. The watchman is in charge of the plant property at night He is neither deputized, nor militarized, and does not wear a uniform. DENISON COTTON MILL COMPANY 931 work for a short time. Except when there is a temporary shortage of men, second hands do not operate machines. They train new em- ployees and receive the highest hourly rate in their respective depart- ments. For approximately 220 production and maintenance workers, there are but 7 admittedly supervisory employees 4 Thus, if second hands are considered part of the Company's supervisory hierarchy, there still are relatively few supervisory employees in proportion to non-supervisory workers. Moreover, in many cases involving produc- tion and maintenance units in the textile industry, we have excluded second hands as supervisory employees. We are persuaded by the foregoing facts that the Company's second hands are clothed with sufficient indicia of supervisory status to warrant their exclusion from the unit. We find that all production and maintenance employees of the Company, including the watchman, but excluding office and clerical employees, foremen, second hands, and all other supervisory employees with' authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collec- tive bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. TIIE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em- ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay- roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elec- tion herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board of Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, -and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of the National Labor Rela- tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Denison Cotton Mill Company, Denison, Texas, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and super- vision of the Regional Director for the Sixteenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and * The plant superintendent and six foremen 6 See e. g. Matter of Piedmont Cotton Mitts, 60 N L R. B 200, Matter of Aponaug Mfg. Co., 36 N. L, R B 371. 662514-46-vol. 63-60 932 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regula- tions, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding any who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the elec- tion, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by United Textile Workers of America, AFL, for the purposes of collec- tive bargaining. / Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation