Denise Y. Harper, Complainant,v.Dr. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 1, 2005
01a52591 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 1, 2005)

01a52591

06-01-2005

Denise Y. Harper, Complainant, v. Dr. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Denise Y. Harper v. Department of the Army

01A52591

06-01-05

.

Denise Y. Harper,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. Francis J. Harvey,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A52591

Agency No. DECAHQFO2004015

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim. In a complaint dated January 13, 2005, complainant

alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the basis of race

(African-American) when:

three desks audits were conducted and the Defense Commissary Agency

(DeCA) Human Resources, failed to accurately rate the GS-11 and GS-12

duties which had previously been performed by white females. Complainant

contends that the incorrect rating of her duties resulted in her position

not being upgraded and, consequently, caused her not to be promoted.

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the

EEOC regulations because complainant failed to show that she suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Further, the EEOC has

long held that an employee cannot use the EEO complaint process to

lodge a collateral attack on another proceeding. The record reveals that

complainant appealed the desk audit to the Office of Personnel Management

(OPM) and OPM stated that the position had been correctly classified.

We find that the EEOC is not the appropriate forum to challenge the

OPM finding. Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

______06-01-05____________

Date