Denise J. Brennan, Complainant,v.Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 7, 2000
01990128 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 7, 2000)

01990128

12-07-2000

Denise J. Brennan, Complainant, v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.


Denise J. Brennan v. Social Security Administration

01990128

December 7, 2000

.

Denise J. Brennan,

Complainant,

v.

Kenneth S. Apfel,

Commissioner,

Social Security Administration,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01990128

Agency No. 98-0603�SSA

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the instant complaint was

improperly dismissed on the by the agency for failure to state a claim

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).<1>

In her complaint, complainant claims that her �management team� subjected

her to retaliatory harassment for filing a prior complaint under

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791, et seq.

Specifically, complainant contends that she had been receiving Office

of Workers' Compensation (OWCP) benefits and was assigned to restricted

duties because of her disability; and that while she was attending

a training class, a supervisor abruptly and rudely called her out

and issued her a memorandum dated June 22, 1998, stating that recent

medical evaluations of her disability indicated that she could perform a

full range of duties, and that she must commence to do so immediately.

Complainant claims that the memorandum was issued with the purpose

of harassing her in retaliation for filing a prior EEO complaint

concerning the agency's purported failure to provide her with reasonable

accommodations for her disability. As evidence, she makes reference

to the abrupt and rude manner in which the memorandum was issued, and

argues that the agency had no authority to issue the memorandum because

OWCP had not issued the required �suitability letter.� Complainant

also asserts that members of her management team acted to embarrassed

her, and to treat her in a hostile and threatening manner regarding the

demand that she return immediately to full duties, noting that repeated

meetings were conducted for this purpose. Complainant further contends

that during the period she performed the full range of duties as ordered,

she suffered substantial physical and emotional ills.

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in

relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to

state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved

employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been

discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,

sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103,

.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined

an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with

respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which

there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request

No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

However, in Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17,21 (1993), the

Supreme Court found that harassment is actionable, even absent a claim

that an agency's action harmed complainant in a specific term, condition

or privilege of employment, as long as the complainant can otherwise

demonstrate that the conduct was engaged in with the purpose of creating a

hostile work environment, and also that the conduct is sufficiently severe

or pervasive as to alter the conditions of the complainant's employment.

A complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless

it appears beyond doubt that the complainant cannot prove a set of facts

in support of the claim which would entitle the complainant to relief.

The trier of fact must consider all of the alleged harassing incidents

and remarks, and considering them together in the light most favorable to

the complainant, determine whether they are sufficient to state a claim.

Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077 (March

13, 1997). Moreover, we note that the Commission takes a broad view

of reprisal claims, wherein a complainant may state a claim by showing

�any discrimination [adverse action] which is reasonably likely to

deter protected activity.� See EEOC Compliance Manual, "Investigating,

Analyzing Retaliation Claims," paragraph 8-II(D)(3).

In this case, the record confirms that OWCP's suitability letter was

issued on July 29, 1998, more than one month after issuance of the

agency's memorandum ordering complainant to immediately undertake

full and unrestricted duties. We note too that OWCP soon rescinded

its suitability letter, on August 4, 1998. Therefore, given the full

circumstances under which the June 22, 1998, memorandum was issued to

complainant, the purported overtly hostile treatment by members of her

management team, and the physical pain and stress which complainant

claimed to experience while performing the ordered full duties, we find

that complainant has stated an actionable claim of harassment due to a

hostile work environment under the legal standards cited above.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint for failure to state a claim is REVERSED. The complaint is

hereby REMANDED for further processing in accordance with the Order below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action

for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the

complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 7, 2000

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.