Denise E. Sandidge, Complainant,v.Hillary Clinton, Secretary, Department of State, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 2, 2009
0120080071 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 2, 2009)

0120080071

04-02-2009

Denise E. Sandidge, Complainant, v. Hillary Clinton, Secretary, Department of State, Agency.


Denise E. Sandidge,

Complainant,

v.

Hillary Clinton,

Secretary,

Department of State,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120080071

Agency No. DOS-F-067-06

Hearing No. 570-2007-00390X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's

appeal from the agency's August 29, 2007, final order concerning her equal

employment opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging employment discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as

amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. Complainant alleged that the agency

discriminated against her on the bases of race (African-American), sex

(female), and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity under Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when she was not selected for one of

two vacant Management Analyst GS-12 positions.1

Following an investigation by the agency, complainant, a Support Systems

Specialist, GS-9, requested a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge

(AJ). The AJ issued a decision without a hearing finding that complainant

failed to show that she was discriminated against. Specifically, the AJ

found that the agency had articulated legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons

for its actions. With respect to position A, the agency explained that

the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) rated and ranked the applicants

and instructed the agency that it was entitled to make a selection from

only the top three available candidates. Complainant was not on the

Certificate of Eligibles provided by OPM and therefore could not have

been selected.

With respect position B, the agency indicated that complainant was

initially listed as one of 14 Eligibles for the position. It was

discovered however, that the Human Resources Specialist forgot to include

in the automated recruitment tool called Quick Hire that applicants

had to possess one year of experience at the next lower grade (GS-11).

Following a review of all of the resumes, the certification was re-issued.

Complainant and two other applicants who were originally identified on

the certification list were deemed no longer eligible because they lacked

the required experience at the GS-11 level. The AJ found that complainant

failed to show that the agency's reasons were pretext for discrimination.

The agency fully implemented the AJ's finding.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the agency's final order,

because the Administrative Judge's issuance of a decision without a

hearing was appropriate and a preponderance of the record evidence does

not establish that discrimination occurred.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact

on the policies, practices, or operations of

the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See

29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof

of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

04/02/09

__________________

Date

1 A black male was selected for each of the positions.

??

??

??

??

3

0120080071

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 77960

Washington, D.C. 20013