Denise Brent, Complainant,v.John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Department of Justice, (Bureau of Prisons), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 10, 2004
01A30035 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 10, 2004)

01A30035

02-10-2004

Denise Brent, Complainant, v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Department of Justice, (Bureau of Prisons), Agency.


Denise Brent v. Department of Justice

01A30035

February 10, 2004

.

Denise Brent,

Complainant,

v.

John Ashcroft,

Attorney General,

Department of Justice,

(Bureau of Prisons),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A30035

Agency No. P210056

DECISION

Complainant timely initiated an appeal from a final agency decision (FAD)

dated August 27, 2002, concerning her complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. In her complaint,

complainant alleged that she was discriminated against on the bases of

race (Black) and sex (female) when:

she was ordered off the Special Housing Unit A-Range by a Lieutenant

(L1); and

she was subjected to a pattern of harassment by her superiors.

The record reveals that during the relevant time, complainant was

employed as an Education Specialist at the agency's Federal Correctional

Institute in Yazoo City, Mississippi. Believing she was a victim of

discrimination, complainant sought EEO counseling and subsequently

filed a formal complaint on November 20, 2000. At the conclusion of

the investigation, complainant was informed of her right to request a

hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) or alternatively, to

receive a final decision by the agency. Complainant requested a hearing,

and, on January 23, 2002, the AJ apparently issued a Scheduling Order

instructing complainant to submit specific information relevant to her

complaint within ninety-five days. When, according to the AJ, complainant

failed to comply with the Scheduling Order within the required time,

the AJ determined that complainant had waived her right to a hearing.

On July 16, 2002, the AJ returned the case file to the agency for issuance

of a final agency decision. In its FAD, the agency made a finding of

no discrimination.

On appeal, complainant contends that on July 19, 2002, she contacted the

AJ and informed him that she had never received a Scheduling Order, which

explains why she had not submitted additional information relevant to her

complaint within ninety-five days pursuant to his order. The AJ refused

to reinstate her hearing request and allegedly instructed complainant

to follow �the appeal process.� Complainant now contends that through

no fault of her own, she was unfairly denied her right to a hearing.

The record contains no evidence that complainant received the Scheduling

Order. Additionally, there is no evidence that prior to remanding

the case to the agency, the AJ issued complainant a Notice and Order

to Show Cause for why the complaint should not be dismissed based on

complainant's failure to prosecute the complaint. Therefore, we are

unable to determine whether the Commission's procedures were properly

followed, or whether the appropriate sanction was to deny the hearing

request and remand the complaint to the agency for a final decision on

the merits of the complaint.

Accordingly, we VACATE the agency's decision and we REMAND the complaint

for a hearing in accordance with this decision and the ORDER below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency shall submit to the Hearings Unit of the Birmingham District

Office the request for a hearing within fifteen (15) calendar days of

the date this decision becomes final. The agency is directed to submit

a copy of the complaint file to the EEOC Hearings Unit within fifteen

(15) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency

shall provide written notification to the Compliance Officer at the

address set forth below that the complaint file has been transmitted to

the Hearings Unit. Thereafter, the Administrative Judge shall issue a

decision on the complaint in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.109 and the

agency shall issue a final action in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.110.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 10, 2004

__________________

Date