Demetria G.,1 Complainant,v.Robert Wilkie, Acting Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.Download PDFEqual Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 13, 20180520180101 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 13, 2018) Copy Citation U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Demetria G.,1 Complainant, v. Robert Wilkie, Acting Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency. Request No. 0520180101 Appeal No. 0120172406 Agency No. 200P-0691-2017102151 DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Complainant timely requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) reconsider its decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120172406 (October 3, 2017). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a), where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c). In her underlying complaint, Complainant claimed that she was discriminated against on the bases of her sex (female), disability (lower back injury), and age (60) when: 1. On March 9, 2017, the Supervisory Clinical Coordinator refused to complete an incident report with regard to Complainant’s workplace injury because the Supervisory Clinical Coordinator was not present when the injury occurred. The Supervisory Clinical Coordinator also failed to properly complete Complainant’s Workers’ Compensation paperwork (CA-2); and 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 0520180101 2 2. On March 16, 2017, the Supervisory Clinical Coordinator refused to sign Complainant’s incident report regarding her workplace injury on March 9, 2017. The Agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) on the grounds of failure to state a claim. The Agency determined that Complainant was alleging discrimination concerning her Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) claim. The Agency stated that Complainant used the EEO complaint process to launch a collateral attack on the OWCP process. On appeal, the Commission affirmed the Agency’s dismissal of the complaint. The Commission found that the proper forum for Complainant to have raised her challenges to the processing of her OWCP claim is with the OWCP. In her request for reconsideration, Complainant contends that her OWCP claim was denied because her Supervisor did not complete an incident report. Complainant maintains that her Supervisor was responsible for completing an incident report in a timely manner. In response, the Agency asserts that Complainant has not satisfied the criteria of a request for reconsideration. The Agency states that Complainant is continuing her previous argument concerning her Supervisor’s alleged failure to complete paperwork needed to pursue OWCP benefits. The Agency maintains that an employee cannot use the EEO process to launch a collateral attack on an adjudicatory proceeding in another forum. We find that Complainant’s request for reconsideration fails to show that our previous decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or would have a substantial impact on the policies, practices or operations of the Agency. We note that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. E.g., Lopez v. Dep’t of Agriculture, EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007); EEO Management Directive for Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), Chap. 9, §VII.A. (Aug. 5, 2015). We find that Complainant’s argument concerning her Supervisor’s alleged failure to complete necessary paperwork for her OWCP claim is a matter that falls outside the purview of the EEO process. This matter concerning the processing of her OWCP claim should instead be raised with the OWCP. After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120172406 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. 0520180101 3 COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610) This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations April 13, 2018 Date Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation