Debra E. Folcarelli, Complainant,v.Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 23, 2009
0120091434 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 23, 2009)

0120091434

06-23-2009

Debra E. Folcarelli, Complainant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Debra E. Folcarelli,

Complainant,

v.

Eric K. Shinseki,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120091434

Agency No. 200H-0650-2008104348

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

final decision dated January 22, 2009, dismissing her complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

791 et seq.

In her formal complaint, complainant alleged that the agency discriminated

against her on the bases of disability (spinal injury) and reprisal for

prior protected EEO activity when her branch chief (S1) (a) on September

26, 2008, issued her a letter of admonishment1 for an incident on August

27, 2008 and (b) subjected her to hostile work environment harassment

when, on October 31, 2008, she expressed negative opinions about

complainant's performance, motivation level, competency and veracity

regarding leave usage in a mediation meeting.

In its January 22 final decision, the agency dismissed (a) and (b)

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4) for electing to pursue the matters

in a negotiated grievance process. Specifically, the agency stated that

complainant filed a grievance regarding the September 22 admonishment

and received the negative comments alleged during a mediation session

with her supervisor. The instant appeal from complainant followed.

On appeal, complainant requested an appeal of actions since April 2005

that singled her out, and stated that she had no choice but to contact

a union representative and attempt mediation.

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4) provides that an

agency may dismiss a complaint where the complainant has raised the matter

in a negotiated grievance procedure that permits claims of discrimination.

In the instant case, the record shows that complainant filed a grievance

concerning the matter identified in claim (a). Additionally, the record

shows that under the terms of the agency's union agreement, employees have

the right to raise matters of alleged discrimination under the statutory

procedure or the negotiated grievance procedure, but not both. As the

record indicates that complainant elected to pursue the matter within

the grievance procedure, we find that the agency properly dismissed claim

(a) pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4).

Further, as to (b), we find that the matter fails to state a claim under

EEOC regulations because complainant failed to show that she suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Moreover, to the extent complainant

is claiming a discriminatory hostile work environment, we find that the

events described, even if proven to be true, would not indicate that

complainant has been subjected to harassment that was sufficiently

severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of her employment. See

Cobb v. Dep't of the Treasury, Request No. 05970077 (March 13, 1997).

Based on the above, we AFFIRM the final agency decision dismissing

complainant's complaint.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 23, 2009

__________________

Date

1 We note that, in a letter dated October 20, 2008, S1 withdrew the letter

of admonishment in response to a first step grievance for complainant.

Complainant acknowledged a grievance.

??

??

??

??

2

0120091434

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120091434