Deborah M. LaManna, Complainant,v.Dr. James B. Peake, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 23, 2008
0120083544 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 23, 2008)

0120083544

10-23-2008

Deborah M. LaManna, Complainant, v. Dr. James B. Peake, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Deborah M. LaManna,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. James B. Peake,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120083544

Agency No. 200P04592008102362

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated June 24, 2008, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely

EEO Counselor contact. In her complaint, complainant alleged that she was

subjected to discrimination on the basis of reprisal for prior protected

EEO activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when, on

December 12, 2007, her telephone privileges were revoked. Further, on

May 28, 2008, complainant raised two claims concerning statements made

by her supervisor from November 2007 through February 2008, regarding

her probationary status, and when she learned her supervisor kept a

calendar on which it was noted that complainant was late.

The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event occurred

on December 4, 2007, but complainant did not initiate contact with an

EEO Counselor until March 27, 2008, which is beyond the forty-five (45)

day limitation period. Further, the claims raised by complainant on May

28, 2008 are also untimely raised. On appeal, complainant has presented

no persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the time

limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact. While she asserts she did not

know about the 45-day limitation period, evidence presented by the agency

reveals she received training in April 2007 on the EEO complaints process,

including the applicable time limitations. Complainant also presented

evidence that she suffered from an anxiety disorder and asserts she

was delayed in making EEO contact because she was not thinking clearly

due to her husband's sudden death on February 12, 2008. While this was

undoubtedly a difficult period for complainant, we note that her husband

died after the expiration of the limitation period. We have consistently

held, in cases involving physical or mental health difficulties, that

an extension is warranted only where an individual is so incapacitated

by his condition that he is unable to meet the regulatory time limits.

See Davis v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05980475

(August 6, 1998); Crear v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request

No. 05920700 (October 29, 1992). The evidence of record does not

establish that complainant has met this standard.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 23, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120083544

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120083544