Deana B. Edwards, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 5, 2009
0120091353 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 5, 2009)

0120091353

06-05-2009

Deana B. Edwards, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Deana B. Edwards,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120091353

Agency No. 4H350000809

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated January 2, 2009, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely

EEO Counselor contact and for failure to state a claim.

In her complaint, complainant alleged that she was subjected to

discrimination on the basis of reprisal for prior protected EEO activity

under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when (1) on August 18,

2008, her supervisor harassed and bullied her and followed her on her

route; (2) on the same date she was told she was not allowed to park

on in spaces designated for the postmaster and clerks. In her formal

complaint, complainant added a third claim, that the agency refused to

pay "back tracking time" to her.

The record discloses that with respect to claims 1 and 2, the alleged

discriminatory events occurred on August 18, 2008, but complainant

did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until November 4,

2008, which is beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period.

On appeal, complainant has presented no persuasive arguments or evidence

warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor

contact. Complainant submits documents indicated that she suffered

from anxiety. We have consistently held, in cases involving physical or

mental health difficulties, that an extension is warranted only where an

individual is so incapacitated by his condition that he is unable to meet

the regulatory time limits. See Davis v. United States Postal Service,

EEOC Request No. 05980475 (August 6, 1998); Crear v. United States Postal

Service, EEOC Request No. 05920700 (October 29, 1992). The information

submitted does not indicate that complainant was so incapacitated that

she could not meet the time frames. Further, with respect to claim 3,

complainant did not provide any specific times frames. In her appeal,

she again mentions not being paid for back tracking while others were, but

again, does not give time frames. Thus, it is impossible to determine if

any such claims occurred with 45 days of her counselor contact, especially

given that complainant states she was off from work from August 25,

2008 through November 18, 2008. As such, the Commission agrees with the

agency that the matter is too vague to state a viable claim of reprisal.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 5, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120091353

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120091353