David Roberts Appellant,v.William H. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southeast/Southwest), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 10, 1998
01971581 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 10, 1998)

01971581

12-10-1998

David Roberts Appellant, v. William H. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southeast/Southwest), Agency.


David Roberts v. United States Postal Service

01971581

December 10, 1998

David Roberts )

Appellant, )

)

v. )

) Appeal No. 01971581

William H. Henderson, ) Agency No. 1H-321-1125-94

Postmaster General, ) Hearing No. 150-95-8218X

United States Postal Service )

(Southeast/Southwest), )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

Appellant timely appealed the agency's final decision concerning his

complaint of unlawful employment discrimination on the basis of his

physical disability (hearing and speech impairment) in violation of �501

of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �791 et seq.

The Commission accepts this appeal in accordance with EEOC Order

No. 960.001.

The record reveals that after a hearing with an EEOC Administrative Judge,

the AJ issued a recommended decision of discrimination, concluding that

on April 12, 1994, the agency unlawfully denied appellant Bid Job #1322,

Distribution Clerk, KP-12, PS-5, because of his physical disability.

As remedial relief, the AJ recommended that the agency take the following

actions:

(1) Pay appellant back pay computed in the manner prescribed by 5

C.F.R. �550.805, and other benefits he would have received but for the

discrimination.

(2) Place appellant in a similar Distribution Clerk position and provide

him with reasonable accommodation for his hearing and speech disability.

(3) Provide training for supervisory and managerial staff at the agency's

main facility in Tallahassee, Florida. The training should detail their

responsibilities under the Rehabilitation Act, as amended, and EEOC

regulations with respect to eliminating discrimination in the Federal

workplace...etc.

(3) Issue all notices required and/or recommended in 29

C.F.R. �1614.501.

Subsequently, the agency issued a final decision adopting the AJ's

recommended finding of discrimination. However, a dispute arose

concerning appellant's entitlement to "out-of-schedule" pay as part of

the AJ's award of "full relief." The agency contends that the AJ did

not specifically address "out-of-schedule" pay, therefore, the final

agency decision adopting the AJ's decision did not include such an award.

Appellant contends that "if there had been no discrimination," he would

have been eligible and would have received "out-of-schedule" pay for

all hours worked outside of Job #1322.

EEOC Regulations provide that when an agency, in an individual case of

discrimination, finds that an employee has been discriminated against, the

agency shall provide full relief, 29 C.F.R. �1614.501; See EEOC Management

Directive (MD) 110, Chapter 8, Section VI (Oct. 22, 1992). Relief is

designed to make a person who has been subjected to discrimination "whole"

by placing him or her "as near as may be, in the situation [they] would

have occupied if the wrong [had] not been committed." Albemarle Paper

Co. v. Moody 422 U.S. 405, 418-19 (1975). This requires eliminating

the particular unlawful employment practice complained of, as well as

restoring the victim to the position he or she would have occupied were

it not for the unlawful discrimination. Id. at 420-21. In addition,

29 C.F.R. �1614.501(a) (2) requires a "commitment that corrective,

curative or preventative action will be taken, or measures adopted, to

ensure that violations of the law similar to those found will not recur."

In the present case, appellant prevailed on his claim of discrimination.

Full relief would entail retroactive placement into the position or

a similar position appellant was unlawfully denied with appropriate

reasonable accommodation for his disabilities, as well as all back pay and

benefits. The Commission has approved the award of "out-of-schedule" pay

as relief in appropriate cases. See Espinosa v. U.S.P.S., EEOC Appeal

No. 01942784 (April 30, 1998); and McDonald v. U.S.P.S., EEOC Appeal

No. 01880699 (May 11, 1988). According to the agency's Employee and Labor

Relations Manual (ELM), Section 434.6 provision for "Out-of-Schedule

Premium," such premium is paid to "eligible full-time bargaining-unit

employees for time worked outside of, and instead of, their regularly

scheduled workday or workweek when employees work on a temporary schedule

at the request of management." Considering the agency's guidelines

for out-of-schedule pay we find that a benefit of appellant's Bid Job

#1322 was eligibility for "out-of-schedule premium." We further find

that an award of "out-of-schedule" pay would not equate to more pay,

allowances, and differentials than appellant would have been entitled

to receive if the unjustified or unwarranted personnel action had not

occurred. Accordingly, we reverse the agency's decision and find that

appellant is entitled, as part of his award of full relief, to any "out

of schedule pay appellant would have received had he been placed in Job

#1322 from April 12, 1994, until the time when the position or similar

position was eventually awarded.

In accordance with this finding, we note that appellant continued to work

in a position which provided him with Saturday and Sunday as off days.

Job #1322 provided appellant with Sunday and Monday as off days and the

following daily work schedule 1600-0050. Therefore, appellant shall be

paid "out-of-schedule"pay for any time he would have worked outside of,

and instead of, his regularly scheduled workday or workweek as provided

by the Job Announcement for Job #1322 located at Exhibit 7 of the

investigative file.

We further note that it would be appropriate for the agency to determined

the amount of time appellant would have worked "out-of-schedule" by

calculating the "out-of-schedule time" of the employee who was awarded

Job #1322 in lieu of appellant. Appellant should be awarded this amount

calculated with his appropriate seniority allowances.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to take the following remedial action:

1. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes

final, the agency is directed, if it has not already done so, to offer

appellant Job #1322 or a similar position and an appropriate reasonable

accommodation for his hearing and speech disabilities. The offer shall

be made in writing. Appellant shall have 15 days from receipt of offer

within which to accept or decline the offer. Failure to accept the offer

within the 15-day period will be considered a declination of the offer,

unless appellant can show that circumstances beyond his control prevented

a response within the time limit.

2. The agency shall determine the appropriate amount of back pay

(with interest, if applicable) and other benefits, including any

"out-of-schedule" premiums appellant would have been eligible

for absent the instant discrimination, due appellant, pursuant to

29 C.F.R. �1614.501, from April 12, 1994, to the date of placement,

no later than sixty (60) calendar days after the date this decision

becomes final. The appellant shall cooperate in the agency's efforts to

compute the amount of back pay and benefits due, and shall provide all

relevant information requested by the agency. If there is a dispute

regarding the exact amount of back pay and/or benefits (including any

out-of-schedule premiums appellant would have been eligible for absent the

instant discrimination), the agency shall issue a check to the appellant

for the undisputed amount within sixty (60) calendar days of the date

the agency determines the amount it believes to be due. The appellant

may petition for enforcement or clarification of the amount in dispute.

The petition for clarification or enforcement must be filed with the

Compliance Officer, at the address referenced in the statement entitled

"Implementation of the Commission's Decision."

3. The agency shall post copies of the attached notice at the Untied

States Postal Service, Main Post Office Facility, Tallahassee, Florida.

Copies of the notice, after being signed by the agency's duly authorized

representative, shall be posted by the agency within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final, and shall remain posted

for sixty (60) consecutive days, in conspicuous places, including all

places where notices to employees are customarily posted. The agency

shall take reasonable steps to ensure that said notices are not altered,

defaced, or covered by any other material. The original signed notice

is to be submitted to the Compliance Officer at the address cited in

the paragraph entitled "Implementation of the Commission's Decision,"

within ten (10) calendar days of the expiration of the posting period.

4. The agency shall provide training in the obligations and duties imposed

by the Rehabilitation Act to the agency official(s) responsible for the

instant action.

5. The agency is further directed to submit a report of compliance, as

provided in the statement entitled "Implementation of the Commission's

Decision." The report shall include supporting documentation of the

agency's calculation of back pay and other benefits, including"out-of-

schedule" pay, due appellant, as well as evidence that the corrective

action has been implemented.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

ATTORNEY'S FEES (H1092)

If appellant has been represented by an attorney (as defined by

29 C.F.R. �1614.501 (e)(1)(iii)), he/she is entitled to an award of

reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the processing of the complaint.

29 C.F.R. �1614.501 (e). The award of attorney's fees shall be paid

by the agency. The attorney shall submit a verified statement of fees

to the agency -- not to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,

Office of Federal Operations -- within thirty (30) calendar days of this

decision becoming final. The agency shall then process the claim for

attorney's fees in accordance with 29 C.F.R. �1614.501.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Dec 10, 1998

______________

Date Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations

NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES

POSTED BY ORDER OF THE

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

An agency of the United States Government

This Notice is posted pursuant to an Order by the United States Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission, dated ________, which found that

a violation of �501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �791 et seq. has occurred at this facility.

Federal law requires that there be no discrimination against any

employee or applicant for employment because of the person's RACE,

COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE, or PHYSICAL or MENTAL

DISABILITY with respect to hiring, firing, promotion, compensation,

or other terms, conditions or privileges of employment.

The United States Postal Service, Main Post Office Facility,

Tallahassee, Florida, supports and will comply with such Federal

law and will not take action against individuals because they have

exercised their rights under law.

The United States Postal Service, Main Post Office Facility,

Tallahassee, Florida, has remedied the employee affected by the

Commission's finding by placing him in a Distribution Clerk, KP-12,

PS-5, or similar position and providing reasonable accommodations for

his disabilities, back pay and out-of-schedule pay, and training in

the obligations and duties imposed by the Rehabilitation Act to the

agency official responsible for the instant action. United States

Postal Service, Main Post Office Facility, Tallahassee, Florida,

will ensure that officials responsible for personnel decisions and

terms and conditions of employment will abide by the requirements

of all Federal equal employment opportunity laws.

The United States Postal Service, Main Post Office Facility,

Tallahassee, Florida, will not in any manner restrain, interfere,

coerce, or retaliate against any individual who exercises his or her

right to oppose practices made unlawful by, or who participates in

proceedings pursuant to, Federal equal employment opportunity law.

Date Posted:

Posting Expires:

29 C.F.R. Part 1614