01993231
11-02-1999
David L. Sexton, Appellant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.
David L. Sexton, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01993231
) Agency No. DON-98-69214-004
Richard J. Danzig, )
Secretary, )
Department of the Navy, )
Agency. )
)
DECISION
Appellant filed an appeal with this Commission from a final decision of
the agency concerning his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination,
in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42
U.S.C. �2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967,
as amended, 29 U.S.C. �621 et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended, 29 U.S.C. �791 et seq. The final agency decision was received
by appellant on February 22, 1999. The appeal was postmarked March 12,
1999. Accordingly, the appeal is timely (see 29 C.F.R. �1614.402(a)),
and is accepted in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960, as amended.
ISSUE PRESENTED
The issue on appeal is whether the agency properly dismissed a portion
of appellant's complaint for failure to state a claim.
BACKGROUND
Appellant contacted an EEO counselor on July 10, 1998, regarding
allegations of discrimination. Specifically, appellant alleged that he
was discriminated against when:
(1) on August 13, 1998 he was suspended for 14 days;
(2) he was harassed about providing information concerning his
disabilities;
(3) on July 28, 1998 his supervisor pushed him on his shoulder;
(4) he was required to seek counseling;
(5) he was assigned computer duties impossible for him to complete due
to his physical disability;
(6) when he went to the hospital during normal duty hours on July 28,
1998, the agency refused to pick him up;
(7) on July 28, 1998, he was required to use sick leave when he left
work during his normal duty hours in a Emergency Medical Service truck;
(8) he was subjected to disciplinary action when the agency,
-initiated investigations against him
-encouraged co-workers to write negative statements
-terminated his participation in training
-assigned unfamiliar work
-set unrealistic deadlines and refused to provide assistance;
(9) on July 29, 1998, the agency issued him two Letters of Counseling; and
(10) on July 30, 1998, the agency issued him a Letter of Requirement
regarding sick leave usage.
Informal efforts to resolve appellant's concerns were
unsuccessful. Accordingly, on September 11, 1998, appellant filed a
formal complaint alleging that he was the victim of unlawful employment
discrimination on the bases of race (White), sex (male), age (DOB
9/10/53), disability (physical and mental), and reprisal (prior EEO
activity).
On February 19, 1999, the agency issued a final decision accepting for
investigation allegation (1) of appellant's complaint but dismissing the
remaining allegations on the grounds that they failed to state a claim.
Specifically, the agency determined that with respect to allegations
(3) through (10), appellant had failed to demonstrate how he had been
aggrieved by the incidents alleged therein.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a) provides, in relevant part, that
an agency shall dismiss a complaint, or portion thereof, that fails to
state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved
employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been
discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,
sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �1614.103;
�1614.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long
defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss
with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which
there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request
No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).
In the instant case, we find that the agency should have treated
appellant's multiple allegations of harassment as one hostile work
environment claim and considered the alleged incidents as examples
of the on-going harassment and discrimination to which the appellant
alleges he was subjected. See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury,
EEOC Request No. 05970077 (March 13, 1997)
Instead of treating the events described in appellant's allegations as
incidents of harassment, however, the agency looked at them individually.
Thus, we find that the agency acted improperly by treating matters raised
in appellant's complaint in a piecemeal manner. See Meaney v. Department
of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05940169 (November 3, 1994)(an agency
should not ignore the �pattern aspect� of a complainant's allegations and
define the issues in a piecemeal manner where an analogous theme unites
the matters complained of.) Consequently, when appellant's allegations
are viewed in the context of appellant's complaint of harassment, they
state a claim and the agency's dismissal of those allegations for failure
to state a claim was improper.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, that portion of the agency's decision dismissing allegations
(2) through (10) is hereby REVERSED. The allegations are REMANDED to
the agency for further processing in accordance with this decision and
the Order below.
ORDER (E1092)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegations in accordance
with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant
that it has received the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to
appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant
of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days
of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise
resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision
without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty
(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy
of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights
must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action.
The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of
the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right
to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's
order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.
See 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively,
the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying
complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File
A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for
enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to
the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the
appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the
complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you
have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you
receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some
jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner
suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your
civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN
THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision
or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the
jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,
you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR
DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your
appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME
AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY
HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME
AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of
your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
November 2, 1999
DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations