David A. Ortega, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 20, 2000
01994807 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 20, 2000)

01994807

07-20-2000

David A. Ortega, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


David A. Ortega v. United States Postal Service

01994807

July 20, 2000

David A. Ortega, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01994807

) Agency No. 4-G-760-0147-99

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an

agency's decision dated dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq., and

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

791 et seq.<1> We accept the appeal pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644,

37,659 (1999) (to be codified at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405).

After unsuccessful EEO counseling, complainant filed a formal complaint

alleging that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race,

sex, age, disability, and reprisal when the agency made him offers for

limited duty assignments which included terms that violated a Merit

System Protection Board (MSPB) settlement agreement.

In its FAD, the agency dismissed the complaint for failure to state

a claim, finding that complainant's claim should be addressed in the

MSPB process, not the EEO process. On appeal, complainant repeats his

contention that the agency has not properly enforced the MSPB settlement

agreement. In response, the agency again avers that complainant is in

the wrong forum, and that his claim must be dismissed.

The Commission has held that an employee cannot use the EEO complaint

process to lodge a collateral attack on another proceeding. See Wills

v. Department of Defense , EEOC Request No. 05970596 (July 30, 1998);

Kleinman v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940585

(September 22, 1994); Lingad v. United States Postal Service, EEOC

Request No. 05930106 (June 25, 1993). The proper forum for complainant

to challenge the agency's enforcement of the settlement agreement at

issue is the MSPB forum. It is inappropriate to now attempt to use the

EEO process to collaterally attack the enforcement of the terms of a

settlement agreement which derived from the MSPB process.

Accordingly, we find that the agency properly dismissed the instant

complaint for failure to state a claim, and we AFFIRM the FAD.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to be codified as 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1)).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

July 20, 2000

____________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_______________ __________________________

Date

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's

federal sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations

apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in

the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where

applicable, in deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended,

may also be found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.