Daniel H. Parker, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 25, 2009
0120070514 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 25, 2009)

0120070514

03-25-2009

Daniel H. Parker, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Daniel H. Parker,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120070514

Agency No. 4H30002306

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated October 16, 2006, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds

that complainant's complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim. In a complaint

dated September 29, 2006, complainant alleged that he was subjected to

harassment and discrimination on the bases of race (American1), sex

(male), color (white), and disability (back injury) when on July 28,

2006, his supervisor threatened to transfer him because of a job-related

injury.

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under

the EEOC regulations because, although complainant's supervisor may have

threatened to transfer him, complainant was never actually transferred,

and therefore failed to show that he suffered harm or loss with respect to

a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy.

See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049

(April 21, 1994). Further, where a complaint does not challenge an

agency action or inaction regarding a specific term, condition, or

privilege of employment, a claim of harassment is actionable only if

the harassment to which the complainant allegedly has been subjected

was sufficiently severe or pervasive so as to alter the conditions of

the complainant's employment. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510

U.S. 17, 21 (1993). A single incident or group of isolated incidents

will not be regarded as discriminatory harassment unless the conduct

is severe. Whether the harassment is sufficiently severe to trigger a

violation must be determined by looking at all of the circumstances,

including the frequency of the discriminatory conduct, its severity,

whether it is physically threatening or humiliating, or a mere offensive

utterance, and whether it unreasonably interferes with an employee's

work performance. See Id.; Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 64-65

(1986); 29 C.F.R. �1604.11(a)(d)(1995). The Commission finds that the

instant complaint fails to state a claim under the EEOC regulations

because complainant has failed to show that the supervisor's single

threat of a transfer was sufficiently severe or pervasive so as to alter

the conditions of employment. Accordingly, the agency's final decision

dismissing complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 25, 2009

Date

1 We note that, under the statutes and regulations enforced by the

Commission, the term "American" connotes a national origin rather than

a race.

??

??

??

??

2

0120070514

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120070514

4

0120070514