Danahy-Faxon Stores, Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsSep 30, 194879 N.L.R.B. 1239 (N.L.R.B. 1948) Copy Citation In the Matter of DANAHY-FAXON STORES, INC., EMPLOYER and RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A. F. OF L., PETITIONER Case No. 3-RC-5,0.-Decided September 30, 1948 DECISION AND ORDER Upon a petition duly filed, a hearing was held before a hearing offi- cer of the National Labor Relations Board. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed., Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-man panel consisting of the undersigned Board Members.* The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. The labor organization involved claims to represent employees of the Employer. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds that no ques- tion of representation exists concerning the representation of em- ployees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act for the following reasons : 2 The Petitioner seeks a unit of all retail clerks in the Employer's retail stores, excluding all meat-department employees and super- visors. In the alternative the Petitioner requests a unit of retail clerks including counter employees in the meat department, but ex- cluding journeymen meat cutters and their apprentices, and supervi- *Houston , Reynolds , and Gray. ' The Employer and Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, Local 34, A. F. of L., herein called the Intervenor , at the hearing and in their briefs, moved to dismiss the petition on various grounds. In view of our dismissal of the petition on the ground that the unit sought by the Petitioner is inappropriate , we find it unnecessary to resolve thg other issues thus raised. 2 The request of the Intervenor for oral argument is denied inasmuch as the record and briefs, in our opinion , adequately present the issues and positions of the parties. 79 N. L. R. B., No. 159. 1239 1240 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD sors . The Employer and the Intervenor contend that because of the close community of interests among all employees, and in view of the history of collective bargaining, only the multi-store-wide unit which the Intervenor now represents is appropriate. About 55 of the Employer's 120 retail stores located in the western part of New York State are involved in this proceeding. Of these, approximately 40 are self-service stores, known as Nu Way Stores, and the remainder are service stores. All of the stores except 5 or 6 of the service stores (the GM Stores), are divided into meat and grocery departments.3 Journeymen meat cutters are the only skilled employees in the stores. Working conditions and employee benefits are similar for all employees, and all are subject to the supervision of the store manager. Since 1939, the Employer and the Intervenor have maintained con- tinuous contractual relations. All employees in the retail stores, ex- cluding the store managers, have been included in a single bargaining unit. No union is seeking to represent the journeymen meat cutters and their apprentices in a separate unit. In view of the foregoing and the long successful history of,collective bargaining on a,multi- store-wide basis, we believe the journeymen meat cutters and their apprentices should be included in the unit with the remainder of the employees.4 We find,^therefore, that the suit sought by the Petitioner is'inappropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, and we shall dismiss the petition. ORDER Upon the basis of the, entire record in this case, the, National Labor Relations Board hereby orders that the petition filed in the instant mattei'be, &nd it hereby is, dismissed. e 'The produce department is included in the grocery department. Cf. Matter of Century-American Corporation ,- Woodstock Typewriter Division, 79 N. L .' R 'B: 43 ; Matter of Lynchburg Transit Company, 79 N. L . R. B. 546. Ji . 'i C f, , Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation