Cynthia H. Lawson, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 19, 2000
01991979 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 19, 2000)

01991979

12-19-2000

Cynthia H. Lawson, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Cynthia H. Lawson v. United States Postal Service

01991979

December 19, 2000

.

Cynthia H. Lawson,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01991979

Agency No. 4-H-350-0252-98

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the complaint was properly defined

by the agency.<1>

In her formal complaint, complainant claimed that she had been

discriminated against on the bases of race, and sex, when on April 28,

1998, she was issued a notice of removal that was subsequently reduced

to a 14-day suspension. By letter dated December 2, 1998, the agency

accepted the complaint for investigation. Specifically, the agency

determined that the matter accepted for investigation was whether

complainant was discriminated against on the bases of race and sex

[when she was] �. . . issued a notice of removal� on April 28, 1998.

Complainant was advised that if she disagreed with the manner in which

the complaint was identified, she was to contact the agency within seven

days of her receipt of the December 2, 1998 letter.

By letter to the agency, complainant stated that when she sought EEO

counseling she claimed that she had been removed from her position on

May 29, 1998. On January 13, 1999, the agency issued a determination

finding that the scope of the investigation would remain as stated in

the December 2, 1998 letter, discussed above. However, a review of the

January 13, 1999 determination shows that the agency added the following

to the acceptance letter: �[complainant] . . .was issued a notice of

removal dated April 20, 1998, with an effective date of May 29, 1998".

The agency provided appeal rights to the Commission in its decision

of January 13, 1999. It is the agency's identification of the matter

accepted for investigation that is the subject of the instant appeal.

On appeal, complainant contends that she filed her complaint because she

was in fact removed from her position, and not merely issued a notice

of removal.

A review of the record persuades the Commission that the agency's

definition of the scope of the investigation was proper. Accordingly,

the agency's decision is AFFIRMED. The scope of the investigation remains

as stated in the December 2, 1998 acceptance letter and the January 13,

1999 final decision that is the subject of this appeal.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 19, 2000

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.