Crystal Perry, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 9, 2005
05a50316 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 9, 2005)

05a50316

03-09-2005

Crystal Perry, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Crystal Perry v. United States Postal Service

05A50316

03-09-05

.

Crystal Perry,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Request No. 05A50316

Appeal No. 01A45329

Agency No. 1K-209-0028-01

Hearing No. 120-2003-00137X

DENIAL

Crystal Perry (complainant) timely requested reconsideration of the

decision in Crystal Perry v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal

No. 01A45329 (November 29, 2004). EEOC Regulations provide that the

Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any

previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that:

(1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a

substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the

agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

After reconsidering the previous decision and the entire record, the

Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny

the request.<1> The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A45329 remains the

Commission's final decision. There is no further right of administrative

appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.<2>

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

____03-09-05______________

Date

1 The Commission notes that complainant

describes facts, including a �saved grade scenario,� which may constitute

a new claim of discrimination. Since this claim was not previously

raised as part of the present complaint, it is inappropriate for her to

raise this new claim for the first time as part of the current request

to reconsider. See Hubbard v. Department of Homeland Security, EEOC

Appeal No. 01A40449 (April 22, 2004).

2 In her request to reconsider, complainant requested information

regarding: (1) what standard is used to determine the validity of an

employee's complaint of job discrimination; (2) where can an employee

find information on previous cases of job discrimination; and (3) how can

an employee obtain records and/or documents to which the employee would

not normally have access to substantiate a claim of discrimination. With

respect to complainant's first question, the EEOC Administrative Judge's

(AJ) decision, dated June 22, 2004, provides the applicable standards

for proving discrimination on pages 1-3 and 8-10 of his decision.

The Commission's website located at www.eeoc.gov also provides information

about the applicable standards, as well as prior Commission decisions in

the Federal Sector under the �Federal Sector Appellate Decisions� link.

Finally, an employee can obtain records and/or documents from the agency

during the agency's investigation and during the discovery period before

the AJ. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108 and .109(d).