Craftlink Printing

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Apr 30, 2004

341 N.L.R.B. 92 (N.L.R.B. 2004)

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
CCP Printing, L.L.C., d/b/a Craftlink Printing and
St. Louis Typographical Union No. 8/CWA
14616 affiliated with Communications Workers
of America, AFL–CIO. Case 14–CA–27642
April 30, 2004
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN BATTISTA AND MEMBERS WALSH
AND MEISBURG
The General Counsel seeks a default judgment in this
case on the ground that the Respondent has failed to file
an answer to the complaint. Upon a charge, amended
charge, and second amended charge filed by the Union
on November 3, 2003, and January 15 and 28, 2004, re-
spectively, the General Counsel issued the complaint on
January 29, 2004, against CCP Printing, L.L.C., d/b/a
Craftlink Printing, the Respondent, alleging that it has
violated Section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act. The Respon-
dent failed to file an answer.
On March 18, 2004, the General Counsel filed a Mo-
tion for Default Judgment with the Board. On March 22,
2004, the Board issued an order transferring the proceed-
ing to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause why the
motion should not be granted. The Respondent filed no
response. The allegations in the motion are therefore
undisputed.
The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its
authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.
Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment
Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations
provides that the allegations in the complaint shall be
deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days
from service of the complaint, unless good cause is
shown. In addition, the complaint affirmatively stated
that unless an answer was filed by February 12, 2004, all
the allegations in the complaint would be considered
admitted. Further, the undisputed allegations in the Gen-
eral Counsel’s motion disclose that the Region, by letter
dated March 5, 2004, notified the Respondent that unless
an answer was received by March 10, 2004, a Motion for
Default Judgment would be filed.1

1 The Respondent’s president advised the General Counsel in a tele-
phone conversation on March 10, 2004, that the Respondent would not
be filing an answer to the complaint, and that he was aware that the
consequence for failing to file an answer would be a motion for default
judgment.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail-
ure to file a timely answer, we grant the General Coun-
sel’s Motion for Default Judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a Missouri cor-
poration, with an office in Creve Coeur, Missouri, and a
facility in St. Louis, Missouri (the facility), has been en-
gaged in the commercial printing business.
During the 12-month period ending August 1, 2003,
the Respondent, in conducting its business operations
described above, performed services valued in excess of
$50,000 for Emerson Electric, Milliken Publishing, and
other enterprises located within the State of Missouri,
each of which are directly engaged in interstate com-
merce and satisfy other than an indirect standard for the
assertion of the Board’s jurisdiction.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act and that St. Louis Typographical Union
No. 8/CWA 14616 affiliated with Communications
Workers of America, AFL–CIO, is a labor organization
within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
At all material times, Kevin Short held the position of
the Respondent’s president, and has been a supervisor of
the Respondent within the meaning of Section 2(11) of
the Act and an agent of the Respondent within the mean-
ing of Section 2(13) of the Act.
The unit of employees of the Respondent set forth in
the collective-bargaining agreement described below
constitutes a unit appropriate for the purposes of collec-
tive bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the
Act.
Since February 14, 2003, and at all material times, the
Union has been the exclusive collective-bargaining rep-
resentative of the unit, and since then, the Union has
been recognized as such representative by the Respon-
dent. This recognition is embodied in a collective-
bargaining agreement effective by its terms from March
1, 2003 to February 28, 2006.2
At all times since February 14, 2003, based on Section
9(a) of the Act, the Union has been the exclusive collec-
tive-bargaining representative of the unit.
Since about August 21, 2003, the Respondent has
failed to continue in effect all the terms and conditions of
the agreement described above by failing and refusing to
2 The date has been corrected to conform to the date set forth in the
agreement rather than the complaint.
341 NLRB No. 92
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 2
pay unit employees for accrued vacation and severance
pay. The Respondent engaged in this conduct without
the Union’s consent.
The terms and conditions of employment set forth
above are mandatory subjects for the purpose of collec-
tive bargaining.
About August 21, 2003, the Respondent ceased opera-
tions at its facility and terminated all unit employees.
The Respondent engaged in this conduct without prior
notice to the Union and without affording the Union an
opportunity to bargain over the effects of this conduct.
About August 22 and 28, September 22, October 6,
2003, and January 13, 2004, the Union, by telephone or
letter, requested that the Respondent bargain collectively
with the Union as the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of the unit over the effects on the unit of
the decision to cease operations and the resulting termi-
nations.
The subjects set forth above relate to wages, hours, and
other terms and conditions of employment of the unit and
are mandatory subjects for the purposes of collective
bargaining.
Since August 21, 2003, the Respondent has failed and
refused to bargain with the Union over the effects on the
unit of its decision to cease operations and the resulting
discharges.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the conduct described above, the Respondent has
failed and refused to bargain collectively and in good
faith with the exclusive collective-bargaining representa-
tive of its employees, and has thereby engaged in unfair
labor practices affecting commerce within the meaning
of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the
Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and
(1) by failing to continue in effect all the terms and con-
ditions of the agreement by failing and refusing to pay
unit employees for accrued vacation and severance pay
since August 21, 2003, we shall order the Respondent to
make whole unit employees for any loss of earnings and
other benefits they have suffered as a result of the Re-
spondent’s unlawful conduct, in the manner set forth in
Ogle Protection Service, 183 NLRB 682 (1970), enfd.
444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971), with interest as prescribed
in New Horizons for the Retarded, 283 NLRB 1173
(1987).
In addition, to remedy the Respondent’s unlawful fail-
ure and refusal to bargain with the Union over the effects
of the Respondent’s decision to cease operations and
terminate all unit employees at its St. Louis, Missouri
facility, we shall order the Respondent to bargain with
the Union, on request, over the effects of its decision. As
a result of the Respondent’s unlawful failure to bargain
in good faith with the Union over the effects of its deci-
sion to cease its business operations, however, the unit
employees have been denied an opportunity to bargain
through their collective-bargaining representative.
Meaningful bargaining cannot be assured until some
measure of economic strength is restored to the Union.
A bargaining order alone, therefore, cannot serve as an
adequate remedy for the unfair labor practices commit-
ted.
Accordingly, we deem it necessary, in order to ensure
that meaningful bargaining occurs and to effectuate the
purposes of the Act, to accompany our bargaining order
with a limited backpay requirement designed both to
make whole the employees for losses suffered as a result
of the violations and to recreate in some practicable
manner a situation in which the parties’ bargaining posi-
tion is not entirely devoid of economic consequences for
the Respondent. We shall do so by ordering the Respon-
dent to pay backpay to the unit employees in a manner
similar to that required in Transmarine Navigation
Corp., 170 NLRB 389 (1968), as clarified by Melody
Toyota, 325 NLRB 846 (1998).3
Thus, the Respondent shall pay the unit employees
backpay at the rate of their normal wages when last in the
Respondent’s employ from 5 business days after the date
of this Decision and Order until occurrence of the earliest
of the following conditions: (1) the date the Respondent
bargains to agreement with the Union on those subjects
pertaining to the effects of the closing of its facility on its
employees; (2) a bona fide impasse in bargaining; (3) the
Union’s failure to request bargaining within 5 business
days after receipt of this Decision and Order, or to com-
mence negotiations within 5 business days after receipt
of the Respondent’s notice of its desire to bargain with
the Union; or (4) the Union’s subsequent failure to bar-
gain in good faith.
In no event shall the sum paid to these employees ex-
ceed the amount they would have earned as wages from
the date on which the Respondent ceased doing business
at the facility to the time they secured equivalent em-
ployment elsewhere, or the date on which the Respon-
dent shall have offered to bargain in good faith, which-
ever occurs sooner. However, in no event shall this sum

3 See also Live Oak Skilled Care & Manor, 300 NLRB 1040 (1990).
CRAFTLINK PRINTING 3
be less than the employees would have earned for a 2-
week period at the rate of their normal wages when last
in the Respondent’s employ. Backpay shall be based on
earnings which the unit employees would normally have
received during the applicable period, less any net in-
terim earnings, and shall be computed in accordance with
F. W. Woolworth Co., 90 NLRB 289 (1950), with inter-
est as prescribed in New Horizons for the Retarded, 283
NLRB 1173 (1987).
Finally, in view of the fact that the Respondent ceased
operations at its St. Louis, Missouri facility, we shall
order the Respondent to mail a copy of the attached no-
tice to the Union and to the last known addresses of unit
employees employed by the Respondent on or after Au-
gust 21, 2003, in order to inform them of the outcome of
this proceeding.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, CCP Printing, L.L.C., d/b/a Craftlink Print-
ing, Creve Coeur, Missouri, and St. Louis, Missouri, its
officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing to continue in effect the collective-
bargaining agreement with the St. Louis Typographical
Union No. 8/CWA 14616 affiliated with Communica-
tions Workers of America, AFL–CIO, effective by its
terms from March 1, 2003, to February 28, 2006, by fail-
ing and refusing to pay accrued vacation and severance
pay to the employees in the appropriate unit set forth in
the agreement.
(b) Ceasing operations and terminating all unit em-
ployees at its St. Louis facility without prior notice to the
Union and without affording the Union an opportunity to
bargain over the effects of the closing and terminations
on unit employees.
(c) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) Make the unit employees whole for any loss of
earnings and other benefits they may have suffered as a
result of the Respondent’s failure to pay accrued vacation
and severance pay, since August 21, 2003, with interest,
as set forth in the remedy section of this decision.
(b) On request, bargain with the Union over the effects
on the unit employees of the Respondent’s decision to
cease operations and terminate all unit employees at its
St. Louis, Missouri facility, and reduce to writing and
sign any agreement reached as a result of such bargain-
ing.
(c) Pay to the unit employees their normal wages for
the period set forth in the remedy section of this decision.
(d) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, or such
additional time as the Regional Director may allow for
good cause shown, provide at a reasonable place desig-
nated by the Board or its agents, all payroll records, so-
cial security payment records, timecards, personnel re-
cords and reports, and all other records including an elec-
tronic copy of such records if stored in electronic form,
necessary to analyze the amount of backpay due under
the terms of this Order.
(e) Within 14 days after service by the Region, dupli-
cate and mail, at its own expense, and after being signed
by the Respondent’s authorized representative, signed
and dated copies of the attached notice marked “Appen-
dix”4 to the Union and to all unit employees employed on
or after August 21, 2003.
(f) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. April 30, 2004

______________________________________
Robert J. Battista, Chairman

______________________________________
Dennis P. Walsh, Member

______________________________________
Ronald Meisburg, Member

(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

APPENDIX

NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
MAILED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government

The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio-
lated Federal labor law and has ordered us to mail and obey
this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO

4 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Mailed by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Mailed Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 4
Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.

WE WILL NOT fail to continue in effect our collective-
bargaining agreement with the St. Louis Typographical
Union No. 8/CWA 14616 affiliated with Communica-
tions Workers of America, AFL–CIO, effective by its
terms from March 1, 2003, to February 28, 2006, by fail-
ing and refusing to pay accrued vacation and severance
pay to employees in the appropriate unit set forth in the
agreement.
WE WILL NOT cease operations and terminate our unit
employees at our St. Louis facility without prior notice to
the Union and without affording the Union an opportu-
nity to bargain over the effects of the closing and termi-
nations on our unit employees.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL make our unit employees whole for any loss
of earnings and other benefits they may have suffered as
a result of our failure to pay accrued vacation and sever-
ance pay since August 21, 2003, with interest.
WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Union over the
effects on our unit employees of our decision to cease
operations and terminate all unit employees at our St.
Louis, Missouri facility, and reduce to writing and sign
any agreement reached as a result of such bargaining.
WE WILL pay our unit employees limited backpay in
connection with our failure to bargain over the effects of
our decision to cease operations and terminate our unit
employees at our St. Louis, Missouri facility, as required
by the Decision and Order of the National Labor Rela-
tions Board.

CCP PRINTING, L.L.C., D/B/A CRAFTLINK
PRINTING