Craddock-Terry Shoe Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsNov 30, 194564 N.L.R.B. 1176 (N.L.R.B. 1945) Copy Citation In the Matter Of' CRADDOCK-TERRY SHOE CORPORATION ( FARMV'ILLE PLANT) and UNITED SHOE WORKERS OF AMERICA, C. I. O. Case No. 5-R-1991.-Decided November 30, 1945 Messrs. Tucker Thurmond and P. N. Burton, of Lynchburg, Va., for the Company. Messrs. Cecil Nash and Raymond H. Goff, of Lynchburg, Va., for the C. I. O. Mr. Leonard J. Ford, of Boston, Mass., and Messrs. Robert TV. Hip- pert and Coleman W. Floyd, of Lynchburg, Va., for the A. F. L. Miss Katherine Loomis, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by United Shoe Workers of America, C. I. 0., herein called the C. I. 0., alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Craddock-Terry Shoe Corporation (Farmville Plant), Farmville, Vir- ginia, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Sidney J. Barban, Trial Examiner. The hearing was held at Lynchburg, Vir- ginia, on August 6, 1945. The Company, the C. I. 0., and Boot and Shoe Workers Union, Local 488, A. F. of L., herein called the A. F. L. appeared and participated. All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. At the hearing the A. F. L. moved to dismiss the C. I. O.'s petition on the ground that the C. I. O. had refused to consent to an immediate election, but insisted on a hearing. The motion is denied. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hear- ing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an opportunity to file briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Craddock-Terry Shoe Corporation operates four plants, all engaged in the manufacture of shoes. Three of the plants are located at Lynch- 64 N. L. R. B, No. 198. 1176 CRADDOCK-TERRY SHOE CORPORATION (FARMVILLE PLANT) 1177 burg, Virginia, and the fourth plant, with which this proceeding is solely concerned, is located at Farmville, Virginia. During the year 1944, the Company's purchases of raw materials for the Farmville plant amounted in value to approximately $625,000, of which 98 per- cent was obtained from sources outside the State of Virginia. During the same period the finished products manufactured at the Farmville plant amounted in value to approximately $1,250,000, of which about 65 percent was shipped to points outside the State of Virginia. The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED United Shoe Workers of America, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the Company. Boot and Shoe Workers Union, Local 488, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, is a labor organization admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. TIIE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION In September 1942, the Company recognized the A. F. L. as the bargaining representative of the production workers at its Farmville plant. This recognition was granted after the Company had ascer- tained, by means of a cross-check of the A. F. L.'s membership cards against employees' signatures in possession of the Company and against the Company's pay roll, that the A. F. L. represented a majority of the employees concerned. Subsequently the Company and the A. F. L. entered into a contract, dated September 15, 1942, which was to remain in effect until September 15, 1943, and which provided that the agreement should automatically renew itself from year to year thereafter unless written notice of a desire to change, modify, or cancel was given by either party 90 days prior to any anniversary date. This contract, which was automatically renewed in 1943 and 1944, covered all employees in the production depart- ments of the Farmville plant, exclusive of supervisory, clerical, and maintenance employees. The C. I. 0., by letter dated June 8, 1945, and received by the Company on June 11, 1945, advised the Company that it represented a majority of the employees of its Farmville plant and requested recognition for the purpose of collective bargaining. The Company, by letter dated June 15, 1945, refused to recognize the C. I. O. on the ground that it lead-a valid and existing contract with the A. F. L. However, neither the A. F. L. nor the Company raises the contract 1178 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD as a bar to the instant proceeding. Clearly it is not, since the Company received notice of the C. I. O.'s claim prior to the 1945 automatic renewal date of the contract.' A statement of a Board agent, introduced into evidence at the hearing, indicates that the C. I. O. represents a substantial number of employees in the unit it claims as appropriate.' We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IP. TIIE APPROPRIATE UNIT; THE DETERMINATION OF RI' PRESENTATIVES The C. I. O. seeks a, unit of all employees in the production depart- ments and the maintenance department of the Company's Farmville plant, excluding clerical employees, foremen, assistant foremen, and the head maintenance man. The Company and the A. F. L. oppose the establishment of the unit sought only insofar as it includes main- tenance department employees. The production departments and the maintenance department are under the supervision of a plant superintendent. There is a foreman, and in some instances, an assistant foreman, in immediate charge of each production department, and a head maintenance man in imme- diate charge of the maitenance department. All operations are carried on in one building, and the maintenance employees spend most of their time in one or another of the production departments 3 Maintenance employees include three watchmen, one elevator opera- tor, five porters, and two machinists. The watchmen are not milita- rized, deputized, nor uniformed. They carry arms only at night when there is no one in the plant. Their main duties are to make the rounds of the plant, punching clocks at various stations. During the day one watchman spends his time in the boiler room firing the boiler. The porters handle supplies in all departments and also clean the building. Machinists repair company-owned machinery in all departments. All the maintenance employees are paid by the hour, whereas the majority of production workers are paid on a piece-work basis. However, the daytime watchman, the elevator operator, the porters, and machinists work the same hours as the production employees, punch the same time 1 See Matter of Groveton Papers Co , 52 N L R B 1256 ; Matter of James Doak, Jr Company, 52 N L R B 378. 2 The Field Examiner reported that the C I 0 submitted 151 authorization for mem- bership cards which bore apparently genuine original signatures , and that the Company submitted a pay-roll list for the week ending June 16 1945. which contained 228 names. Of the 11 maintenance department employees sought by the C I 0, that organization submitted cards signed by 5. The A . F of L submitted its contract as evidence of its interest in the proceeding 3 The production process is carried on in the following departments : the cutting, stitch- ing, lasting , making , finishing , packing, and stock fitting departments CRADDOCK-TERRY SHOE CORPORATION (FARMVILLE PLANT) 1179 clocks, and are paid by the same paymaster. Maintenance department employees have been excluded from the coverage of the contract be- tween the Company and the A. F. L., and it is for this reason that the contracting parties seek their exclusion from the unit. Ordinarily, in the face of a contract which does not include disputed employees, we exclude them 4 But, here, the C. I. O. represents a sub- stantial number of maintenance employees,5 and they constitute a de- partmental group which could be represented for collective bargaining purposes either as a separate unit or, as desired by the C. I. 0., as part of a production and maintenance unit. Accordingly, we shall not make a determination of the appropriate unit or units at this time. We shall first ascertain the desires of the employees by means of elec- tions by secret ballot. Upon the results of these elections will depend, in part, our finding as to the unit or units.6 We shall direct that separate elections be conducted among the em- ployees in the separate voting groups described below, who were em- ployed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elections herein, subject to the limitations and addi- tions set forth in the Direction. 1. All employees in the producton departments of the Company's Farmville plant, excluding clerical employees, foremen, assistant fore- men, and all other supervisory employees with authority to hire, pro- mote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action; and 2. All employees in the maintenance department of the Company's Farmville plant, excluding the head maintenance man, and all other supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees or effectively recommend such action.7 If both groups select the C. I. O. as their bargaining representative, they will be taken to have indicated a desire to constitute a single ap- propriate unit. Should each group select a different bargaining agent, they will be taken to have indicated a desire to constitute separate units. DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, See Matter of C J Petersen and C F Lytle, d/b/a Petersen & Little, 60 N L R B. 1070 See footnote 2, supra 6 See Matter of Pittsburgh Equitable Meter Company, 61 N L It B 880 7 Since the record fails to indicate that the A F L desires to represent maintenance employees and, in addition reveals that it has no representation among these employees, we shall not provide a place on the ballot for the A F L in the voting group of maintenance employees 1180 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Craddock-Terry. Shoe Corporation (Farmville Plant), Farmville, Virginia, separate elections by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than sixty (60) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Fifth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Rela- tions Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among the employees in the groups described below, who were employed during the pay-roil period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election : 1. All employees in the production departments of the Company's Farmville plant, excluding clerical employees, foremen, assistant fore- men, and all other supervisory employees with authority to hire, pro- mote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, to determine whether they desire to be represented by United Shoe Workers of America, C. I. 0., or by Boot and Shoe Workers Union, Local 488, A. F. L., for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither; and 2. All employees in the maintenance department of the Company's Farmville plant, excluding the head maintenance man, and all other supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by United Shoe Workers of America, C. I. 0., for the purposes of collective bargaining. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation