0120150230
02-19-2015
Complainant,
v.
Robert McDonald,
Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120150230
Agency No. 2004-0512-2014102956
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's final decision dated September 22, 2014, dismissing a formal complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.
BACKGROUND
During the period at issue, Complainant worked as a Medical Support Assistant at the Agency's Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Baltimore, Maryland.
On June 26, 2014, Complainant filed the instant formal complaint. Therein, Complainant alleged that she was subjected to harassment and a hostile work environment on the bases of sex (female) and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when:
1. in January 2014, an unidentified co-worker told her that an Operator stated to her "if people stop talking to you, it's because you are with [Complainant];"
2. on March 31, 2014, the Operator entered the office where Complainant was sitting and held a conversation with her supervisor;
3. on April 1, 2014, the Operator and a Nurse made a complaint about a patient being sent to 4B because they thought Complainant had sent the patient there;
4. on April 8, 2014, while in the office talking to Complainant's supervisor, the Operator was standing behind the chair where Complainant sits and paced back and forth behind Complainant;
5. on April 21, 2014, the Operator entered the office where Complainant was sitting and held a conversation with the supervisor;
6. on April 21, 2014, the Operator "stared" at Complainant as she walked down the hall;
7. on May 23, 2014, the Operator stood in the hallway across from Complainant for approximately 20 minutes while talking to the supervisor;
8. on June 4, 2014, the Operator stood in the doorway "staring" at Complainant while having a conversation with a co-worker;
9. on June 4, 2014, the Operator "mocked" the way Complainant walks when she mimicked the Complainant's walk;
10. on June 13, 2014, the Operator entered the office where Complainant was sitting to have a discussion with the supervisor concerning a class that the Operator needed to attend; and
11. on June 19, 2014, the supervisor stood over Complainant while conducting her performance evaluation even though Complainant stated her objection to the matter in which he conducted the evaluation.
In its September 22, 2014 final decision, the Agency dismissed the instant formal complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).
The instant appeal followed.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in relevant part, that an Agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim. An Agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).
Complainant has not alleged a personal loss or harm regarding a term, condition or privilege of her employment. There is no allegation that Complainant was disciplined or subjected to any adverse personnel action as a result of the alleged events. To the extent Complainant is claiming a discriminatory hostile work environment, we find that the events described, even if proven to be true and considered together, would not indicate that Complainant has been subjected to harassment that was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of her employment. See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077 (March 13, 1997). Finally, the alleged Agency actions were not of a type reasonably likely to deter Complainant or others from engaging in prior protected activity. Lindsey v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05980410 (November 4, 1999) (citing EEOC Compliance Manual, No. 915.003 (May 20, 1998).
Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing the formal complaint for failure to state a claim is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
February 19, 2015
__________________
Date
2
0120150230
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120150230
5
0120150230