Complainant,v.Daniel M. Tangherlini, Administrator, General Services Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 9, 2015
0120151346 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 9, 2015)

0120151346

07-09-2015

Complainant, v. Daniel M. Tangherlini, Administrator, General Services Administration, Agency.


Complainant,

v.

Daniel M. Tangherlini,

Administrator,

General Services Administration,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120151346

Agency No. GSA-14-NCR-WP-0126

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's final decision dated February 2, 2015, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

BACKGROUND

During the period at issue, Complainant worked as a Senior Lease Contract Specialist at the Agency's Potomac Service Center in Washington, D.C.1

On January 7, 2014, Complainant filed the instant formal complaint. Therein, Complainant alleged that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race, sex, disability, age, and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when:

he regularly experienced hostility from certain team members and was singled out and deprived of basic privileges.

The Agency dismissed the instant complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1), finding that Complainant was not aggrieved. The Agency further stated that the Office of Civil Rights sent two separate emails Complainant on January 8 and, 13, 2015 but his response was not sufficient. The Agency stated that on January 23, 2015, the Office of Civil Rights sent a letter to Complainant, informing him that failure to clarify his allegations within five days of receipt could result in the dismissal of the complaint, but that a response was never sent to the Agency. Moreover, the Agency stated that Complainant was contacted by phone on January 20, 2015 but he refused to clarify his allegations.

The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

While the Agency dismissed the instant complaint for failure to state a claim, we find that it is more properly analyzed as failure to cooperate, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7). The Commission has held that an Agency should not dismiss a complaint when it has sufficient information upon which to base an adjudication. See Ross v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05900693 (August 17, 1990); Brinson v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05900193 (April 12, 1990). It is only in cases where the Complainant has engaged in delay or contumacious conduct and the record is insufficient or permit adjudication that the Commission has allowed a complaint to be dismissed for failure to cooperate. See Card v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05970095 (April 23, 1998); Kroten v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940451 (December 22, 1994).

The record contains no evidence that Complainant engaged in delay or contumacious conduct in regard to the processing of the instant complaint. The record contains a copy of the Agency's January 23, 2015 letter. Therein, the Agency requested that Complainant provide a clarification of his allegations within five calendar days of its receipt. We note, however, that our regulations require that Complainant to respond to the Agency's request within fifteen days of its receipt, not five days.

Moreover, a review of the instant formal complaint and EEO Counselor's Report indicates that Complainant provided extensive information to the EEO Counselor about his allegations of discrimination. The record reflects that Complainant provided information to the EEO Counselor about his allegations of discrimination. Specifically, Complainant alleged that he was subjected to harassment and a hostile work environment by Agency management, was issued a proposed removal, and his reasonable accommodation requests were denied. The record further reflects the reasons Complainant felt that he was discriminated against and contains specific information regarding the discriminatory actions, the names of the alleged discriminatory officials, and the corrective action sought.

Therefore, we find that the Agency should have completed its investigation of the instant formal complaint and allowed for a decision on the merits rather than dismissing the formal complaint for failure to state a claim. Furthermore, Complainant is advised to cooperate in the further processing of these claims, or face possible dismissal for failure to cooperate, if he does not do so.

We REVERSE the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's formal complaint, defined herein as a harassment claim, and we REMAND this matter to the Agency for further processing in accordance with the ORDER below.

ORDER

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claim (harassment/hostile work environment and violation of Rehabilitation Act) in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claim within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.

A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 9, 2015

__________________

Date

1 The record reflects that in August 2014, Complainant was terminated from Agency employment.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120151346

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120151346

6

0120151346