Clyde Fish, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 24, 2000
01a00569 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 24, 2000)

01a00569

04-24-2000

Clyde Fish, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Clyde Fish, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01A00569

) Agency No. 4H-335-0254-99

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

On October 28, 1999, complainant filed a timely appeal with this

Commission from a final agency decision (FAD) issued on October 19,

1999, pertaining to his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of

1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. and the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.<1>

Pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified at 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405), the Commission accepts the complainant's appeal from

the agency's final decision in the above-entitled matter.

ISSUE PRESENTED

The issue presented herein is whether the agency properly dismissed the

present complaint for failure to cooperate.

BACKGROUND

The record reflects that complainant, a rural letter carrier, for the

United States Postal Service, was denied light duty and placed on forced

leave because he was incapable of performing the functions of his job

due to physical disabilities.

Believing that he was the victim of discrimination, complainant, on April

14, 1999, initiated contact with an EEO Counselor. During the counseling

period, complainant stated that he received a notice of proposed forced

leave from management and complainant specifically named both the Post

Master and his supervisor as the responsible agency officials.

Counseling failed, and on May 5, 1999, complainant filed a formal

complaint claiming that he was the victim of unlawful discrimination on

the bases of his age (forty and over), disability (physical) and reprisal

(prior EEO activity). The formal complaint was comprised of the matters

for which complainant underwent EEO counseling, discussed above.

Subsequent to filing the formal complaint, the agency, on August 6,

1999, requested additional information from complainant. This request

was received by complainant on August 7, 1999. Complainant did not

respond to this request. Again, for a second time, on August 30,

1999, the agency requested additional information from complainant.

The second request was received by complainant on September 1, 1999.

This request was also not responded to.

Consequently, on October 19, 1999, the agency issued a final decision

dismissing the present complainant for failure to cooperate. The agency

found that complainant received both requests for additional information

and failed to respond.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

Volume 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to be codified and hereinafter

cited as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7)) provides for the dismissal of a

complaint where the agency has provided the complainant with a written

request to provide relevant information or otherwise proceed with the

complaint, and the complainant has failed to respond to the request within

15 days of its receipt or the complainant's response does not address

the agency's request, provided that the request included a notice of the

proposed dismissal. The regulation further provides that, instead of

dismissing for failure to cooperate, the complaint may be adjudicated

if sufficient information for that purpose is available.

Under the circumstances in this case, we find that the agency's dismissal

was improper. The record indicates that on August 7, 1999 and September

1, 1999, complainant received memorandums from the agency requesting that

he furnish an affidavit, and indicating that failure to do so within 15

days would result in dismissal of his complaint. According to the agency,

complainant failed to furnish his affidavit within the requisite time

frame, and therefore, his complaint should be dismissed for failure

to cooperate. We note, however, that the agency failed to show why

complainant's affidavit was necessary for the further processing of

the complaint.

The agency has not claimed that the complaint was vague, and the agency

found that there was sufficient information in the record to be able to

define the complaint and accept it for investigation. Moreover, we note

that complainant's complaint, along with the EEO Counselor's Report,

addressed the incident of alleged discrimination, with reference to

the responsible agency official by name, the bases on which he alleged

discrimination, and the corrective action sought.

The Commission has held that as a general rule, an agency should not

dismiss a complaint when it has sufficient information on which to base

an adjudication. See Ross v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request

No. 05900693 (August 17, 1990); Brinson v. United States Postal Service,

EEOC Request No. 05900193 (April 12, 1990). It is only in cases where

the complainant has engaged in delay or contumacious conduct and the

record is insufficient to permit adjudication that the Commission has

allowed a complaint to be dismissed for failure to cooperate. See Card

v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05970095 (April 23,

1998); Kroeten v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940451

(December 22, 1994). Therefore, under the circumstances, we find that

the agency's dismissal of complainant's complaint for failure to cooperate

was improper.

CONCLUSION

For the reason set forth herein, the Commission hereby REVERSES the

decision of the agency dismissing the present complaint for failure

to cooperate. Accordingly, the complaint is REMANDED to the agency

for further processing in accordance with this decision and applicable

regulations.

ORDER (E1199)

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded claims in accordance with

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656-7 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108). The agency shall acknowledge to

the complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty

(30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency

shall issue to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall

notify complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty

(150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the

matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant

requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue

a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's

request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and an

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the

complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order,

the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a

civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior

to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408), and 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a

civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph

below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407

and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the

underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �

2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION

(R1199)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN

THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

April 24, 2000

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_______________ __________________________

Date Equal Employment Assistant1On November 9, 1999, revised

regulations governing the EEOC's federal sector complaint process

went into effect. These regulations apply to all federal sector

EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative process.

Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations found

at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.