Clauzell Waters, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 25, 1999
01983692 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 25, 1999)

01983692

06-25-1999

Clauzell Waters, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Clauzell Waters, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01983692

) Agency No. 1A 072 0001-97

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

_________________________________)

DECISION

Appellant filed the instant appeal from the agency's decision dated

January 22, 1998 dismissing appellant's complaint for failing to timely

contact an EEO Counselor and as moot.

As an initial matter the agency argues that appellant failed to timely

file the instant appeal. The instant appeal was filed on April 8, 1998.

The agency argues that appellant's representative received the agency's

decision on February 5, 1998. If an appellant's representative is

an attorney, then the time frame for filing an appeal is computed

from the time of receipt of the agency decision by the attorney.

29 C.F.R. �1614.402(b). Appellant's representative in the instant

matter, however, is not an attorney. Therefore, the 30 day time

limit for filing an appeal in the instant matter does not commence

until appellant received the agency decision. 29 C.F.R. �1614.402(a).

The agency has not shown when appellant received the agency decision.

Therefore, we can not find the appeal to be untimely filed.

The agency defined the complaint as alleging that "beginning January 21,

1996, [appellant's] supervisor began to complain that [appellant was]

not working fast enough for her, was constantly on [appellant's] back,

told [appellant] that [appellant was] not allowed to go downstairs at

all, and hassled [appellant] non-stop." The agency found that appellant

initially contacted an EEO Counselor on September 13, 1996 and that none

of the incidents were within 45 days preceding appellant's September 13,

1996 contact.

Aggrieved persons must contact an EEO Counselor within 45 days of the date

of the matter alleged to be discriminatory. 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(1).

In appellant's request for EEO counseling appellant indicated that

the alleged harassment was continuing until the time appellant sought

EEO counseling. It is not clear from the complaint or elsewhere in the

record if the alleged harassing incidents occurred within 45 days prior

to appellant's initial contact of an EEO Counselor. Therefore, we shall

remand the complaint so that the agency can contact appellant to clarify

the exact dates of the incidents in question. Thereafter the agency

shall redetermine whether appellant timely contacted an EEO Counselor.

The agency also dismissed the complaint as moot because appellant had been

removed from the agency. The agency found that appellant did not allege

in the complaint that he was discriminatorily removed. Appellant clearly

raised the removal allegation with the EEO Counselor. While appellant did

not expressly raise the removal allegation in the complaint, the complaint

can be construed as alleging harassment in an ongoing nature. We note

that the agency's letter dated January 28, 1997 initially accepting the

complaint defined the complaint as alleging harassment "culminating"

in appellant's removal. Therefore, viewing the record as a whole, we

shall remand the complaint so that the agency may contact appellant to

clarify whether he is raising the removal allegation in the complaint.

Thereafter the agency shall redetermine whether the complaint is moot.

The agency's decision dismissing the complaint is VACATED and we REMAND

the complaint to the agency for further processing in accordance with

this decision and applicable regulations.

ORDER

The agency shall contact appellant to clarify:

The dates of incidents in the complaint.

Whether appellant is alleging that he was discriminatorily removed.

The agency shall then reconsider whether the complaint should be dismissed

for untimely EEO Counselor contact and as being moot. Within 60 days of

the date this decision becomes final the agency shall issue a letter

to appellant accepting the complaint for investigation or issue a new

decision dismissing the complaint. A copy of the letter accepting the

complaint or new decision dismissing the complaint must be sent to the

Compliance Officer as referenced herein.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to

File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil

action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is

subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16� (Supp. V 1993).

If the appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

June 25, 1999

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations