01a05768
10-31-2000
Clarissa J. Hirner, Complainant, v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.
Clarissa J. Hirner v. Department of Commerce
01A05768
October 31, 2000
.
Clarissa J. Hirner,
Complainant,
v.
Norman Y. Mineta,
Secretary,
Department of Commerce,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A05768
Agency No. 00-63-00951D
DECISION
The instant matter is being processed pursuant to a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) entered into by the agency, the Bureau of the Census,
and the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.<1> The
MOU was entered into in order to process complaints arising from the
2000 Decennial Census more effectively and efficiently.
Pursuant to the MOU, individuals file their complaints directly with
the Commission. The Commission, through its Washington, D.C. Field
Office, then conducts an early assessment of complaints and neutral
evaluation of cases. The Washington, D.C. Field Office of the Commission
establishes a record of the complaint by obtaining an affidavit from the
complainant and by contacting an agency official to obtain the necessary
information on the complaint. Based on the record established by the
Washington, D.C. Field Office, the Washington, D.C. Field Office will:
(1) notify the agency that the individual has elected not to file a
formal complaint; (2) issue a decision dismissing the complaint and
notify the complainant of his or her right to appeal the decision to
the Office of Federal Operations; (3) conduct settlement negotiations;
or (4) notify the complainant that the complaint has been accepted and
forward the complaint to the agency for further investigation.
By decision dated August 2, 2000, the Commission's Washington, D.C. Field
Office dismissed the instant complaint �as based on 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107.�
The complaint was defined as alleging wrongful termination on the bases
of religion (Catholic), physical disability (mitrao valve prolapse), and
retaliation. In its dismissal, the Field office found that complainant
established no prima facie case of disability or religious discrimination,
and had engaged in no prior protected activity as required for retaliation
claims. The Field Office explained that �working out of the chain of
command� was not adequate grounds for a claim of retaliation. The Field
Office noted that complainant was terminated for failing to manage her
operations well, making excessively long trips, failing to complete her
other work, and failing to request (or use) any overtime to complete
her work.
On appeal, complainant disputes the agency's articulated reasons for her
termination. She also claims that her supervisor and co-workers berated
her a number of times prior to her termination, and made inappropriate
remarks about her religion and disability. Complainant enclosed a
calendar of notes regarding overtime requests, and included a copy of
letters requesting payment for the overtime she worked.
Although the Field Office failed to specify the grounds for its dismissal,
the Commission interprets its analysis as a dismissal for failure
to state a claim. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). To state a claim,
complainant must allege present harm inflicted on the basis of race, sex,
religion, national origin, age, disability, or prior protected activity.
See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049
(April 21, 1994).
The Field Office improperly addressed the merits of complainant's claims
in its procedural dismissal. Whether complainant established a prima
facie case is irrelevant to the procedural issue of whether she stated
a cognizable claim. The Commission finds that complainant raised more
than merely her termination -- complainant alleged harm from a pattern of
harassment from her supervisor and co-workers culminating in termination.
To the extent she claims these actions were taken because of her religion
and physical disability, she has stated a claim.
Complainant also contends that the agency acted in retaliation for
her working outside of the chain-of-command. EEOC Regulations prohibit
retaliation against an individual for opposing any practice made unlawful
by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII) (42 U.S.C. � 2000e et
seq.), the Equal Pay Act (29 U.S.C. � 206(d)), the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act (29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.), the Rehabilitation Act
(29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.), or for participating in any stage of
administrative or judicial proceedings under these statutes. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.101(b). Complainant has not engaged in any of these
prior protected activities, and therefore, fails to state a claim of
retaliation.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the dismissal of the basis of retaliation is AFFIRMED.
The dismissal of her other claims is REVERSED, and the claims, as defined
herein, are REMANDED for further investigation.
ORDER
As provided in the Memorandum of Understanding, the Washington Field
Office shall conduct settlement negotiations and, if unsuccessful,
forward the files to the agency for investigation. The agency shall
complete its investigation within 180 days upon receipt of the file.
At the conclusion of the investigation, the agency must forward a
copy of the investigation to complainant, and provide her rights to a
final agency decision, or a hearing with an EEOC Administrative Judge.
The agency must provide the Compliance Officer with a copy of its cover
letter sending the investigation and notice of rights to complainant
as indicated herein. If the complaint has been settled or otherwise
closed within the 180 day time frame, then the agency must provide the
Compliance Officer with notice of such.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of
the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right
to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order
prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29
C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,
the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying
complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File
A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action
for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject
to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the
complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the
complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0900)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)
This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it
also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a
portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in
an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar
days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion
of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion
of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative
processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after
one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your
complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until
such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.
If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the
complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,
identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file
a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
October 31, 2000
__________________
Date
1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations
governing the EEOC's federal sector complaint process went into effect.
These regulations apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at
any stage in the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission
will apply the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in
deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be
found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.