Claire L. Burke, Complainant,v.Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 29, 2001
01A11557 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 29, 2001)

01A11557

03-29-2001

Claire L. Burke, Complainant, v. Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


Claire L. Burke v. Department of the Treasury

01A11557

March 29, 2001

.

Claire L. Burke,

Complainant,

v.

Paul H. O'Neill,

Secretary,

Department of the Treasury,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A11557

Agency No. 01-3013M

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the complaint was properly

dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO

Counselor contact.

The record shows that by letter dated January 12, 2000, the agency

advised complainant that her failure to report to work on February 7,

2000, would result in her removal. By letter dated January 26, 2000,

complainant informed the agency that the January 12, 2000 letter left her

�no alternative but to apply for retirement effective January 31, 2000."

On January 26, 2000, complainant also sent a letter to the union informing

them that although she wanted to come back to work, she could not do

so pursuant to her physician's orders. By letter dated March 13, 2000,

complainant informed her Congressman that she had been discriminated by

the agency when it forced her to retire. On July 8, 2000, complainant

requested that the Commission provide her with assistance concerning

her forced retirement.

On August 6, 2000, complainant sought EEO counseling from the agency,

claiming that she had been discriminated against on the basis of

disability when in January 2000, the agency forced her to retire.

Complainant claimed that it never occurred to her to file a complaint

with the agency because she was no longer an employee of the agency.

Subsequently, complainant filed a formal complaint of discrimination.

The agency issued a final decision dismissing the complaint for untimely

EEO Counselor contact.

On appeal, complainant contends, inter alia, that as a seasonal unit

manager until 1997, she was �very aware of the EEO and its functions�.

She further contends, however, that she was unaware that she could

still seek EEO counseling once she was no longer an agency employee.

Complainant claims that she was forced to retire effective January

31, 2000. The record further shows that by letters dated January 26,

2000, she informed the agency and the union that she had been left no

choice but to retire from her position. In her March 13, 2000 letter to

a member of Congress, she stated that she had been discriminated against.

However, complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until

August 6, 2000, which is beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period

regarding the matter set forth in her complaint. Based on the record,

we find that complainant's argument that she was aware of her EEO rights

until 1997, but unaware that she could still seek EEO counseling after

she was allegedly forced to retire, is not persuasive. Accordingly,

the agency's final decision dismissing the complaint for untimely EEO

Counselor contact is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 29, 2001

__________________

Date