Chris Ramlochan, Complainant,v.Gary Locke, Secretary, Department of Commerce, (Bureau of the Census), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 14, 2011
0120111108 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 14, 2011)

0120111108

02-14-2011

Chris Ramlochan, Complainant, v. Gary Locke, Secretary, Department of Commerce, (Bureau of the Census), Agency.


Chris Ramlochan,

Complainant,

v.

Gary Locke,

Secretary,

Department of Commerce,

(Bureau of the Census),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120111108

Agency No. 10-63-02779D

DECISION

Upon review, we find that the Agency's decision dated November 8, 2010,

dismissing Complainant's complaint due to untimely EEO Counselor is

proper pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(2). The Agency's decision

dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.

BACKGROUND

The Agency defined Complainant's complaint as whether Complainant,

a former Crew Leader Assistant, with the Agency's Pompano Beach Local

Census Office, was discriminated against based on race (not specified),

color (brown), and national origin (East Indian Ancestry) when: (1)

he was terminated on May 11, 2010; and, (2) he was subjected to fraud,

whistleblowing, unpaid wages, defamation and slander.

The Agency stated that Complainant's EEO Counselor contact with regard

to his complaint on July 8, 2010, was beyond the 45-day time limit set

by the regulations.

On appeal, Complainant contends that he did not know about the 45-day

time limit to contact an EEO Counselor. Complainant also contends that he

was actually alleging that he was not paid for the day he was terminated.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of

discrimination be brought to the attention of the EEO Counselor within

45 days of the alleged discriminatory event, or the effective date of

an alleged discriminatory personnel action.

During EEO counseling, the EEO Counselor asked Complainant why his EEO

Counselor contact was beyond the 45-day deadline. Complainant indicated

that he untimely contacted an EEO Counselor when he previously tried

to resolve the alleged matters with management which was unsuccessful.

EEO Counselor's Report, p. 1. Complainant confirms that statement

on appeal. Complainant did not claim prior to the dismissal of the

complaint that he was not aware of the 45-day time limit. We find that

he cannot now claim that he was not aware of the requisite time limit

for the first time on appeal when had been given the opportunity by

the Agency, prior to its dismissal of the complaint, to explain why the

contact was untimely. Complainant's December 3, 2010 Appeal Brief, p. 1.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Agency's decision dismissing Complainant's complaint

is AFFIRMED.1

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the

request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as

stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

2/14/11

__________________

Date

1 We note that since the Agency's dismissal of the complaint is affirmed

due to untimely filing of a formal complaint, we need not address its

dismissal of a portion of the complaint for failure to state a claim,

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

??

??

??

??

2

0120111108

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013