Cher B.,1 Complainant,v.Dr. Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., M.D., Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Agency.Download PDFEqual Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 9, 20180520180278 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 9, 2018) Copy Citation U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Cher B.,1 Complainant, v. Dr. Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., M.D., Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Agency. Request No. 0520180278 Appeal No. 0120180409 Agency No. HUD-00125-2017 DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Complainant timely requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) reconsider its decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120180409 (January 31, 2018). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a), where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c). In her underlying complaint, Complainant, a Construction Analyst, claimed that she was discriminated against on the basis of her sex (female) when on June 2, 2017, she was terminated during her probationary period. In its final decision, the Agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(2) on the grounds that Complainant failed to file her formal complaint in a timely manner. 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 0520180278 2 On appeal, the Commission affirmed the Agency’s dismissal of the complaint. The Commission found that Complainant received the Notice of Right to File a Formal Complaint on October 2, 2017, and did not file her formal complaint until October 18, 2017, after the expiration of the fifteen-day filing period. The Commission stated that the filing period commenced on October 3, 2017, and Complainant had to file her complaint by no later than October 17, 2017. In her request for reconsideration, Complainant argues that she was timely in filing her formal complaint. Complainant maintains that the fifteen-day filing period did not commence until October 3, 2017, and that her complaint was timely filed since October 18, 2017 is fifteen days later. We observe that Complainant has not presented sufficient persuasive evidence in support of her position. The Commission emphasizes that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (Aug. 5, 2015); see, e.g., Lopez v. Dep't of Agric., EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007). Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here. The record reveals that Complainant received the Notice of Right to File a Formal Complaint on October 2, 2017, and filed her formal complaint on October 18, 2017, which was one day after the expiration of the 15-day filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. We discern no persuasive argument or evidence in Complainant’s request for reconsideration that satisfy the criteria for granting a request to reconsider. After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120180409 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610) This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. 0520180278 3 RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations August 9, 2018 Date Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation