Charlotte Barlow-Johnson, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 17, 2010
0120091714 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 17, 2010)

0120091714

06-17-2010

Charlotte Barlow-Johnson, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.


Charlotte Barlow-Johnson,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southwest Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120091714

Agency No. 1G754000509

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated February 2, 2009, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds

that complainant's complaint was improperly dismissed pursuant to 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim. In her complaint,

complainant alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the

bases of race (African American), disability, and in reprisal for prior

protected EEO activity when:

1. On October 8, 2008, she was sexually harassed by her supervisor; and

2. On October 15, 2008, her supervisor shoved her into a rail.

The record reveals that Complainant was a Clerk at the Agency's North

Texas Processing and Distribution Center in Coppell, Texas when the

alleged discriminatory action took place. The record reflects that

Complainant requested pre-complaint processing on October 20, 2008,

and received a Notice of Right to File an Individual Complaint of

Discrimination (PS Form 2579-A) on January 6, 2009. Three days later,

on January 9, 2009, Complainant filed a formal complaint of discrimination

with the Agency.

The Agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)

for failure to state a claim. The Agency found that Complainant failed

to demonstrate that she was an aggrieved employee who had suffered a

personal loss or harm with respect to a term, condition, or privilege

of employment.

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in

relevant part, that an Agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to

state a claim. In determining whether a harassment complaint states a

claim in cases where a Complainant has not alleged disparate treatment

regarding a specific term, condition, or privilege of employment, the

Commission has repeatedly examined whether a Complainant's harassment

claims, when considered together and assumed to be true, were sufficient

to state a hostile or abusive work environment claim. See Estate of

Routson v. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, EEOC Request

No. 05970388 (February 26, 1999).

Upon review, the Commission finds that the Agency improperly dismissed

the complaint for failure to state a claim. Complainant alleged that

she was sexually harassed when her supervisor stated, "[t]o be eating

peanuts on the workroom floor you have to be giving up something."

Complainant further alleged that, one week later, the supervisor

grabbed her by the arms and pushed her into a steel rail while yelling

at her. Complainant maintained that she suffered injuries from the

assault. We find that the claims are sufficiently severe to state a

claim of harassment. See Sanford v. Department of Veterans Affairs,

EEOC Appeal No. 0120093442 (November 27, 2009) (finding that a claim

of a single act of touching was sufficiently severe to state a claim);

Nichols v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120092008

(June 25, 2009) (finding that physical assault was sufficient to support

a claim of a hostile work environment); Czubakowski v. United States

Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120065036 (May 15, 2007) (finding that

physical assault accompanied with defamatory language was sufficiently

severe to state a claim of hostile work environment).

We also find that Complainant has shown an injury or harm to a term,

condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy.

See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049

(April 21, 1994). Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint is REVERSED. The complaint is hereby REMANDED

to the agency for further processing in accordance with this decision

and the Order below.

ORDER (E0408)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue

to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.

A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0408)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The

Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington,

D.C. 20036. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation,

and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If

the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has

the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance

with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil

action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated

in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant

files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint,

including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See

29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof

of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action,

you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that

you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil

action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official

title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in

court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not

the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both

the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__6/17/10________________

Date

2

0120091714

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120091714