Charley L.,1 Petitioner,v.Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 14, 2016
0320160024 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 14, 2016)

0320160024

04-14-2016

Charley L.,1 Petitioner, v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southeast Area), Agency.


U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

Charley L.,1

Petitioner,

v.

Megan J. Brennan,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Southeast Area),

Agency.

Petition No. 0320160024

MSPB No. DA0752140106I1

DENIAL OF CONSIDERATION

On February 12, 2016, Petitioner filed a timely petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission asking for review of a Final Order issued by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concerning his claim of discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.

Petitioner worked as a Letter Carrier at the Agency's Post Office in Shreveport, Louisiana. Petitioner filed a mixed case appeal alleging that the Agency discriminated against him on the basis of disability when, effective May 20, 1997, he was removed from his position for unsatisfactory attendance/absence without leave (AWOL).

On December 23, 2013, the MSPB issued an Initial Decision dismissing Petitioner's appeal as untimely filed. The decision noted that a timeliness order was issued providing Petitioner with the opportunity to submit evidence and argument to support his claims and show that his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Petitioner did not respond to the order. Petitioner subsequently filed a petition from the Initial Decision with the full MSPB Board (Board). The Board dismissed the petition for review as untimely filed, and the Initial Decision became the final decision of the Board. Petitioner then filed the instant petition.

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over mixed case appeals on which the MSPB has issued a decision that makes determinations on allegations of discrimination. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.303 et seq. The Commission must determine whether the decision of the MSPB with respect to the allegation of discrimination constitutes a correct interpretation of any applicable law, rule, regulation or policy directive, and is supported by the evidence in the record as a whole. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.305(c). Here, the MSPB did not make a determination on the merits of any allegations of discrimination. Because the MSPB did not address any matters within the Commission's jurisdiction, the Commission has no jurisdiction to review Petitioner's case. Consequently, the Commission will DENY consideration of the petition for review.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0610)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court, based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)

If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court

has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__4/14/16________________

Date

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Petitioner's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0320160024