Charles Leonard, Complainant,v.William S. Cohen, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Logistics Agency), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 20, 2000
01994801 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 20, 2000)

01994801

04-20-2000

Charles Leonard, Complainant, v. William S. Cohen, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Logistics Agency), Agency.


Charles Leonard, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01994801

) Agency No. JQ99-030

William S. Cohen, )

Secretary, )

Department of Defense, )

(Defense Logistics Agency), )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

The Commission finds that the agency's decision dated April 26, 1999,

which dismissed a portion of the complaint for failure to state a

claim and the remaining portion for failure to comply with applicable

time limits, is proper pursuant to the regulations set forth at 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37656 (to be codified and hereinafter referred to as

29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) and � 1614.107(a)(2)).<1>

Complainant alleged that he was discriminated against when:

in September 1998, a co-worker denied him the opportunity to purchase

a pizza that she was selling for her son's Cub Scout Troop fundraiser;

he was denied the opportunity to give blood on October 2, 1998, while

a co-worker (Mason) was permitted to give blood;

on September 5, 1998, a co-worker, who was acting temporarily as a

supervisor, stated that he was �free, white, over 21, and could do

whatever he wanted;�

on September 4, 1998, his supervisor denied his request to see his

7B Card (Employee Record Card) and instructed him to contact a Labor

Management Employee Relations Specialist to see it; and

on September 29, 1998, his branch chief denied seeing a statement that

complainant attached to his SF-71 form (Application for Leave), removing

the statement, and giving it to a co-worker.

The Commission finds that the agency properly dismissed claim 1 for

failure to state a claim. The agency dismissed claims 2, 3, 4, and 5

for failure to comply with applicable time limits. The agency found

that complainant had not contacted an EEO counselor within the 45-day

time frame. The complainant contacted the EEO counselor on November 17,

1998, and the alleged discriminatory events occurred on October 2, 1998

(claim 2), September 5, 1998 (claim 3), September 4, 1998 (claim 4), and

September 29, 1998 (claim 5). The Commission finds that the complainant

failed to timely contact an EEO Counselor regarding claims 2 - 5.

Accordingly, the agency's decision dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

April 20, 2000

____________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_______________ __________________________

Date 1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's

federal sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations

apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in

the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where

applicable, in deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended,

may also be found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.