Charlene Brown, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 9, 2000
01991399 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 9, 2000)

01991399

02-09-2000

Charlene Brown, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Charlene Brown, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01991399

) Agency No. 1D-271-0013-98

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

The Commission finds that the agency's decision dated October 21, 1998

dismissing a portion of the complaint (alleging specific incidents of

sexual harassment) for untimely EEO Counselor contact is proper pursuant

to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37656 (to be codified as and hereinafter cited

as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2)).<1> Although direct appeals of decisions

partially dismissing a complaint are no longer permissible under the

regulations revised on November 9, 1999, the agency has informed the

Commission that the remainder of the complaint was the subject of an

agency decision on June 18, 1999. Therefore, we shall consider the

instant appeal because there are apparently no remaining claims from

the instant complaint pending anywhere in the administrative EEO process.

Complainant should have reasonably suspected discrimination at the time

of the incidents listed in claims 1 - 6 (occurring from February 1997

through December 1997) which were more than 45 days prior to complainant's

initial EEO Counselor contact on March 2, 1998.

The Commission recognizes that the instant complaint is one claim

of sexual harassment; nevertheless, complainant is still obligated

to contact an EEO Counselor within 45 days of when she should have

reasonably suspected discrimination. The alleged incidents in claims

1 - 6 were of such a nature (e.g, asked by her supervisor to have sex

with her supervisor) that complainant should have reasonably suspected

discrimination at the time of the incidents. The incidents were not

so trivial such that complainant could have not appreciated that the

incidents constituted harassment and rendered her aggrieved at the time

of the incidents. Complainant is entitled to have the most recent 45

days of harassment accepted as timely by the agency (which the agency did

accept for investigation) and the untimely claims should be considered as

background information which complainant can use to aid her in her attempt

to show harassment, but for which complainant can not be remedied.

Complainant has failed to show that she was unable to contact an EEO

Counselor in a timely manner. For instance, although complainant claims

that the EEO office did not answer her telephone calls, she also admits

that she did receive recorded messages when she called. Complainant has

not claimed that she was unable to contact the EEO office by leaving a

telephone message, sending an electronic mail message, sending a letter

or facsimile, or by visiting the EEO office (or EEO Counselor) in person.

The agency's decision dismissing a portion of the complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1199)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS

OF RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.405). All requests and arguments must be

submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the

absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed

timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration

of the applicable filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.604).

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the

other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S1199)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

February 9, 2000

DATE

Carlton

M.

Hadden,

Acting

Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_____________________ _________________________ Date

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

Federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.