Ceatrice H. Sanders, Complainant,v.John W. Snow, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 9, 2003
01A22752_r (E.E.O.C. Dec. 9, 2003)

01A22752_r

12-09-2003

Ceatrice H. Sanders, Complainant, v. John W. Snow, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


Ceatrice H. Sanders v. Department of the Treasury

01A22752

December 9, 2003

.

Ceatrice H. Sanders,

Complainant,

v.

John W. Snow,

Secretary,

Department of the Treasury,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A22752

Agency No. 98-2285

Hearing No. 360-99-8504X

DECISION

Complainant appeals to the Commission from the agency's March 11, 2002

decision finding no discrimination. Complainant alleges discrimination on

the basis of race (Black) when she was not selected for promotion to the

position of Supervisory Accounting Technician, GS-525-10. On February

12, 2002, an Administrative Judge (AJ) issued a decision finding no

discrimination. Specifically, the AJ found that the agency offered a

legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for its action which complainant

failed to rebut. On March 11, 2002, the agency issued a decision fully

implementing the agency's decision, which is the subject of this appeal.

The record indicates that during a March 1998 meeting, it was announced

that Ms. X would be detailed for 60 days to the position of manager in

federal Tax Deposit Unit, Accounts Services Section. Ms. X's detail

was extended to 120 days. In early June 1998, during Ms. X's detail,

a vacancy announcement was posted to permanently fill the position.

That position is the position at issue in the instant complaint.

Complainant argues, first, that she was not offered the detail.

Second, complainant argues that she was not selected for the position.

The record indicates that the manager responsible for filling the detail

requested input from other managers regarding suggestions as to who would

be appropriate for the position. The selecting manager was given two

names, one being Ms. X who was ultimately chosen. Complainant was not

referred to the selecting manager. The record shows that the selecting

manager did not know that complainant was interested in the detail.

When the vacancy announcement was posted, complainant applied and was

among the three best qualified for the position. The selecting panel

consisted of three people. Ms. X was ultimately selected.

According to the selecting officials on the panel, the selectee was chosen

because of her leadership qualities. The selecting officials indicated

that complainant did not answer the questions during the interview as

well as Ms. X. The selecting officials also indicated that complainant

appeared nervous during the interview and answered the questions in

generalities, particularly the questions regarding leadership skills.

There is no indication that Ms. X, while on detail in the position,

performed poorly. The agency has presented legitimate, nondiscriminatory

reasons for the nonselection of complainant, which complainant has failed

to rebut. Complainant has failed to show, by a preponderance of the

evidence, that she was discriminated against on the basis of race.

The agency's decision finding no discrimination is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 9, 2003

__________________

Date