0120092436
10-02-2009
Catherine E. Gaines-Auld, Complainant, v. Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.
Catherine E. Gaines-Auld,
Complainant,
v.
Ray Mabus,
Secretary,
Department of the Navy,
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120092436
Agency No. 096328500901
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's
decision dated April 22, 2009, dismissing her complaint of unlawful
employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.
Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was
properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely
EEO Counselor contact.
In her complaint, complainant alleged that she was subjected to
discrimination on the basis of sex (female) when: in November 2008,
she received a FOIA copy of her May 2007 administrative grievance,
which showed that the Deciding Official predetermined the outcome;
during August 2007, she was initially denied a cash award; on June 25,
2007, she was realigned to another position, and on May 21, 2007, she was
strongly encouraged to waive all EEO rights and file an administrative
grievance against a senior manager.
The record shows that complainant initiated contact with an EEO Counselor
on December 22, 2008. EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires
that complaints of discrimination should be brought to the attention
of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45)
days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the
case of a personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective
date of the action. The Commission has adopted a "reasonable suspicion"
standard (as opposed to a "supportive facts" standard) to determine
when the forty-five (45) day limitation period is triggered. See Howard
v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970852 (February 11, 1999).
Thus, the time limitation is not triggered until a complainant reasonably
suspects discrimination, but before all the facts that support a charge
of discrimination have become apparent.
EEOC Regulations provide that the agency or the Commission shall extend
the time limits when the individual shows that she was not notified of the
time limits and was not otherwise aware of them, that she did not know
and reasonably should not have known that the discriminatory matter or
personnel action occurred, that despite due diligence she was prevented
by circumstances beyond her control from contacting the Counselor within
the time limits, or for other reasons considered sufficient by the agency
or the Commission.
On appeal, complainant asserts, inter alia, that she was encouraged
to resolve her concerns through the agency's administrative grievance
procedure, instead of the EEO complainant process. She states that the
agency's representative (Assistant Counsel) "failed to offer, provide or
suggest consulting with an EEO Counselor knowing that my claims would be
fully substantiated in any unbiased investigative process." However, the
record reflects that agency "Flowcharts" detailing EEO contact timeframes
had been posted throughout complainant's work area. Further, complainant
had fulfilled the agency's mandatory, annual EEO training requirement.
Complainant had reasonable suspicion of discrimination from May 2007
through August 2007, but waited until December 22, 2008, after she
had received a FOIA copy of her May 2007 administrative grievance,
to initiate contact with an EEO counselor.
On appeal, complainant has presented no persuasive arguments or
evidence warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO
Counselor contact. Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing
complainant's complaint for untimely EEO Counselor contact is affirmed.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M1208)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the
policies, practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,
Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request
to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail
within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party. Failure to file within the time
period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration
as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely
filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted
with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider
requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very
limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the
defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that
the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also
permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other
security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within
the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with
the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.
Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time
limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
October 2, 2009
__________________
Date
2
0120092436
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
3
0120092436