Catherine Creek, Complainant,v.I. Michael Heyman, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 13, 2000
01a03076 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 13, 2000)

01a03076

09-13-2000

Catherine Creek, Complainant, v. I. Michael Heyman, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, Agency.


Catherine Creek v. Smithsonian Institution

01A03076

September 13, 2000

.

Catherine Creek,

Complainant,

v.

I. Michael Heyman,

Secretary,

Smithsonian Institution,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A03076

Agency No. 97-28-040297

DISMISSAL

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an agency

decision dated February 10, 2000, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Age Discrimination

in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.;

and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

791 et seq. <1>

On February 10, 2000, the agency issued a final decision, on the merits,

finding no discrimination. Within the decision, the agency addressed the

issue of whether complainant was constructively discharged, and found that

she was not constructively discharged. This decision provided complainant

with appeal rights to the Commission. On March 22, 2000,subsequent to

filing the instant appeal, the agency reissued complainant appeal rights.

The appeal rights in the March 22, 2000 letter explained that complainant

had filed a mixed case complaint and therefore could appeal the decision

to the Merit Systems Protection Board (�MSPB�) and not the EEOC.

Therefore, pursuant to EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.302(d) (3),

complainant has improperly appealed the agency's February 10, 2000

decision to the Commission. As a result, we hereby dismiss complainant's

appeal. We note that if complainant files an appeal with the MSPB, and

is dissatisfied with the MSPB decision, then she may file a petition with

the EEOC to consider the MSPB decision pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.303.

For the reasons set forth herein, we hereby DISMISS complainant's appeal.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 13, 2000

__________________

Date

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.