Carolyn J. Mills, Complainant,v.Robert M. Gates, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Army & Air Force Exchange Service), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 3, 2009
0120092095 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 3, 2009)

0120092095

08-03-2009

Carolyn J. Mills, Complainant, v. Robert M. Gates, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Army & Air Force Exchange Service), Agency.


Carolyn J. Mills,

Complainant,

v.

Robert M. Gates,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

(Army & Air Force Exchange Service),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120092095

Agency No. AAFES09009

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated March 12, 2009, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29

U.S.C. � 621 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's

complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2),

for untimely EEO Counselor contact. In her complaint, complainant alleged

that she was subjected to discrimination on the basis of color (Black),

race (African American) and age (48 years at time of incidents) when:

1. Complainant was isolated from other employees;

2. Complainant was segregated and excluded from her hired position;

3. Effective October 31, 2007, complainant was laterally transferred as

a Procurement Assistant, HPP 2/1 from Category Team Manager facility to

PAR Direct Delivery;

4. Complainant was not transferred back to her position after being

transferred to a lower position.

The record discloses that the most recent alleged discriminatory event

occurred on October 31, 2007 but complainant did not initiate contact with

an EEO Counselor until June 20, 2008, which is beyond the forty-five (45)

day limitation period. Complainant maintains that she contacted the EEO

office in October 2007 and spoke with someone named either Nelson or John.

The agency contends that no one by either name works in the EEO office.

Complainant also contends that she was out on medical leave "in October

as well as the following months into 2008." On appeal complainant

presents medical documentation showing that following gall bladder

removal surgery she was discharged from the hospital on November 7,

2007, and was admitted again on January 28, 2008 and February 8, 2008.

Following a review of the record we find that complainant has presented

no persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the time

limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact. Assuming for the sake of

argument that complainant was medically incapacitated up to November

7, 2007, her medical evidence does not explain why she did not contact

an EEO counselor after her first discharge on November 7, 2007 and her

second admission on January 28, 2008. Accordingly, the agency's final

decision dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 3, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120092095

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120092095