Carmen I. Molina, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 13, 2006
0120062549 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 13, 2006)

0120062549

11-13-2006

Carmen I. Molina, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Carmen I. Molina,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01200625491

Agency No. 1A102003405

DECISION

Complainant appeals to the Commission from the agency's decision dated

February 24, 2006, finding no discrimination. In her complaint,

complainant, a Mail Handler, at the agency's Morgan Processing &

Distribution Center, alleged discrimination based on disability

(Fibromyalgia/Asthma) when beginning on May 25, 2005, she was sent home

without being permitted to work a full eight hours.

After completion of the investigation of the complaint, complainant did

not request a hearing, and then, the agency issued its decision concluding

that it asserted legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for its action,

which complainant failed to rebut.

After a review of the record, the Commission, assuming arguendo that

complainant had established a prima facie case of discrimination,

finds that the agency has articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory

reasons for the alleged action. Complainant's supervisor stated that

during the relevant time period, there was inadequate work within her

light duty limitations. The supervisor indicated that there was an

insufficient volume of mail in the area in which complainant was working

to keep both regular and light duty employees occupied. He stated that

all light duty assignments were given on a case by case basis and based

on the limitations of the employee and available work. The record shows

that complainant returned to work on some dates following May 25, 2005.

After a review of the record, the Commission finds that the agency

has articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for the alleged

incident and that complainant failed to show that the agency's reasons

were pretext for discrimination. Furthermore, the Commission finds that

complainant was not denied a reasonable accommodation. The agency stated

and we agree that complainant failed to identify any specific light duty

jobs that were available but which she was denied during the relevant

time period at issue. After a review of the record, the Commission finds

that complainant failed to show, by a preponderance of the evidence that

she was discriminated against. The Commission does not address in this

decision whether complainant is a qualified individual with a disability.

Accordingly, the agency's decision finding no discrimination is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact

on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 13, 2006

__________________

Date

1 Due to a new data system, your case has been redesignated with the

above referenced appeal number.

??

??

??

??

2

0120062549

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036