0520180296
06-07-2018
Carlton T.,1 Complainant, v. Richard V. Spencer, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
Carlton T.,1
Complainant,
v.
Richard V. Spencer,
Secretary,
Department of the Navy,
Agency.
Request No. 0520180296
Appeal No. 0120151566
Agency No. 120012802163
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Complainant timely requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) reconsider its decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120151566 (February 7, 2018). EEOC regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(a), where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c).
Complainant was an Automotive Skills Branch Manager in the Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Department at the Agency's Naval Station in Great Lakes, Illinois. Complainant filed an EEO complaint, later amended, alleging that the Agency discriminated against him on the bases of disability, age, and reprisal when he was subjected to a hostile work environment. Complainant raised twelve allegations in support of his claim, including, but not limited to: his supervisor being irritated when he asked for additional time off; his second line supervisor spoke to him in a loud voice; he felt he was not completely trained; he was pulled away from his work daily to do other work; an issue regarding polo shirts he ordered as part of his uniform; he received an unsatisfactory performance evaluation on March 26, 2012; on the same date he received a letter of caution; he was hospitalized because of stress; he received a notice of proposed disability separation; he was asked if he wanted to sign resignation papers; and his position was posted as a vacancy.
Complainant did not request a hearing. Our prior appellate decision affirmed the Agency's final decision that concluded that Complainant failed to prove that the Agency subjected him to discrimination or a hostile work environment as alleged. The decision also noted that Complainant did not show that he was denied reasonable accommodation when the Agency would not transfer him to another branch.
In his request for reconsideration, Complainant expresses his disagreement with the previous decision. We emphasize that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. See EEO MD-110, Ch. 9, � VII.A. Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here.
After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120151566 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
June 7, 2018
__________________
Date
1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
2
0520180296
3
0520180296