Carlos Gutierrez, Complainant, Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 14, 2000
04970003 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 14, 2000)

04970003

04-14-2000

Carlos Gutierrez, Complainant, Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.


Carlos Gutierrez v. Department of Justice

04970003

April 14, 2000

Carlos Gutierrez, )

Complainant, )

)

) Petition No. 04970003

) Appeal No. 01942709

Janet Reno, ) Agency Nos. I-87-5483

Attorney General, ) I-88-5554

Department of Justice, ) Hearing Nos. 360-93-8264X

Agency. ) 360-93-8265X

______________________________)

DECISION ON PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT

BACKGROUND

On October 16, 1996, Carlos Gutierrez (petitioner) initiated a petition

for enforcement (the Petition) to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC) requesting enforcement of a February 26, 1996 Commission

Order. In the February 26, 1996 Order, the Department of Justice (the

agency) was directed to redress petitioner for acts of discrimination

based on his disability in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. The petition for enforcement is

accepted by this Commission in accordance with 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644,

37,659 (to be codified at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405).<1>

In Appeal No. 01942709, the Commission issued a decision finding that the

agency discriminated against petitioner on the basis of his disability

when, in March 1987, he was not selected for the position of Legalization

Adjudicator, GS-1801-5/7/9. In its Order, the Commission directed the

agency to do the following:

(1) place petitioner in a Legal Adjudicator, GS-1801-5/7/9 position, or

if this position was no longer available, in a substantially equivalent

position to the one he would have occupied had he

originally been awarded the position. The position was to be awarded

retroactive to the date petitioner would have been hired;

(2) award petitioner backpay, plus interest, from the effective date

petitioner would have occupied the Legal Adjudicator position as well as

all benefits associated with the position which he would have received

but for the discrimination; and,

(3) post a notice at its offices in El Paso, Texas.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a) provides that a complainant may

petition the Commission for enforcement of a decision issued under the

Commission's appellate jurisdiction. The petition shall be submitted

to the Office of Federal Operations.

Placement in Position

By letter dated December 26, 1996, the agency informed the Commission

that the Legal Adjudicator position no longer existed at the agency but

that petitioner's official personnel folder was adjusted to reflect his

reassignment to a Legal Adjudicator position in 1987. Standard Form -50

records forwarded by the agency indicate that the agency adjustments

included petitioner's promotion to the GS-9 level effective in March

1989. The agency also informed the Commission that on September 21, 1991,

petitioner was reassigned to a GS-07 Information Status Verifier position,

a substantially equivalent position. The record additionally shows that in

March 1997, petitioner was offered the position of Paralegal Specialist

(FOIA)/PA), GS-950-7/9, in the agency's El Past District Office, El

Paso, Texas. The position was offered to petitioner at the GS-7 grade

level. In April, 1997, petitioner accepted this offer.

In a February 21, 1997, letter to the Commission regarding his Petition,

petitioner discusses his backpay award but makes no mention of the

agency's obligation to promote him and petitioner provides no other

specific contentions regarding this aspect of the Commission's Order.

It appears from the record that the agency has complied with its

obligation to promote petitioner to a position substantially equivalent to

the one he would have occupied absent the discrimination and, as noted,

petitioner has offered no information to indicate otherwise. However,

we view the agency's retroactive promotion of petitioner to the

GS-9 level in March 1989 as an indication that petitioner would have

reached that grade level through career ladder promotion as of that

date, if he had not been denied placement in the position in 1987 due

to discrimination. Therefore, the agency is required to retroactively

afford him that GS-9 grade level as of the date of his September 1991

reassignment and downgrade.

Backpay

By letter dated December 26, 1996, the agency informed the Commission

that on November 26, 1996, the appropriate paperwork was forwarded to

the National Finance Center to implement petitioner's backpay award of

$10,963.64 for the years of 1987 through 1991 with the money to be placed

in petitioner's bank account on December 30, 1996. The record contains

a Payroll Action Request, dated November 26, 1996, indicating that this

action was taken. In the February 21, 1997 letter, mentioned above,

petitioner asks for a written report as to the criteria utilized by the

agency to arrive at the $10,963.64 amount.

It appears that the agency reimbursed petitioner with regard to some

of the backpay that he is due. However, the record indicates that as

of 1991, petitioner was, at least on the record, moved from the Legal

Adjudicator position at the GS-9 grade level to an Immigration Status

Verifier position at the GS-7 level. There is no evidence that petitioner

received an appropriate amount of backpay for the years of 1991 onward

when he occupied the GS-7 job. Accordingly, we remand this aspect of the

Petition and order the agency to grant petitioner appropriate backpay for

the years, from 1991 on, when he occupied the Immigration Status Verifier

and later the Paralegal Specialist position at the GS-7 grade level.

Posting Order

The agency submitted a copy of the appropriate Posting Notice indicating

that the Notice was posted on August 13, 1996, with posting to expire

on November 12, 1996. Therefore, the Commission finds that the agency

has complied with this aspect of the Order.

ORDER (C1199)

The agency is ORDERED to take the following remedial action:

Within sixty (60) days of the date this decision becomes final,

the agency shall repromote petitioner to the GS-9 grade level in his

present Paralegal Specialist position and award petitioner an appropriate

amount of backpay, plus interest, with regard to the salary he would have

received had he continued since September 21, 1991, in the Immigration

Status Verifier position at the GS-9 grade level instead of at the

GS-7 grade level. The agency shall include with this award appropriate

documentation relating to the backpay award.

The agency is further directed to submit a report of compliance, as

provided in the statement entitled "Implementation of the Commission's

Decision." The report shall include supporting documentation verifying

that the corrective action has been implemented.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the

complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order,

the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a

civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior

to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408), and 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a

civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph

below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407

and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the

underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �

2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (Q1199)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing In the alternative, you may file a civil action AFTER

ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission.

If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE

COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD,

IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the

Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in

which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must

be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

April 14, 2000

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_______________________ ___________________________

Date Equal Employment Assistant

1 On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.