Carlos A. Powell, Sr., Complainant,v.Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 5, 2012
0120111161 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 5, 2012)

0120111161

01-05-2012

Carlos A. Powell, Sr., Complainant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.




Carlos A. Powell, Sr.,

Complainant,

v.

Eric K. Shinseki,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120111161

Agency No. 200P03452010104518

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated November 29, 2010, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a File Clerk at the Agency’s facility in Phoenix, Arizona.

On October 8, 2010, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that

the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race (not

specified), sex (male), color (not specified), and disability when,

on August 5, 2010, Complainant was issued a proposed removal which was

sustained and he was removed effective September 17, 2010. The Agency

dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(2), for

untimely filing of the formal complaint.

The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(2) states, in

pertinent part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint which fails

to comply with the applicable time limits contained in 29 C.F.R. §

1614.106(b) which, in turn, requires the filing of a formal complaint

within fifteen (15) days of receiving the notice of the right to do so.

The record discloses that Complainant received the notice of right to file

a formal complaint on September 20, 2010. Accordingly, Complainant had

until October 5, 2010, to file his complaint. The record establishes that

Complainant filed his complaint by mail in an envelope without a postmark.

The complaint is date-stamped as received by the Agency on October 13,

2010. 29 C.F.R. §1614.604(b) provides that a document shall be deemed

timely if it is received or postmarked before the expiration of the

applicable filing period, or, in the absence of a legible postmark,

if it is received in the mail within five days of the expiration of

the applicable filing period. Therefore, in its dismissal decision,

the Agency properly construed the complaint filing date to be October 8,

2010, which was still three days beyond the fifteen-day filing period.

The Agency sought to find out the reason for Complainant’s delay

in filing his formal complaint, but he did not response to their

inquiries. On appeal, Complainant states he was sick and his children

were also sick, and that he was trying to attend school. Complainant

has not offered adequate justification to warrant an extension of

the time limit for filing the complaint. We have consistently held,

in cases involving physical or mental health difficulties, that an

extension is warranted only where an individual is so incapacitated by

his condition that he is unable to meet the regulatory time limits. See

Davis v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Request No. 05980475 (Aug. 6, 1998);

Crear v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Request No. 05920700 (Oct. 29, 1992).

Complainant has not established that he met this standard.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 5, 2012

__________________

Date

2

0120111161

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120111161