Carla S. Smith, Complainant,v.Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 26, 2002
01A11821_r (E.E.O.C. Sep. 26, 2002)

01A11821_r

09-26-2002

Carla S. Smith, Complainant, v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.


Carla S. Smith v. Department of Transportation

01A11821

September 26, 2002

.

Carla S. Smith,

Complainant,

v.

Norman Y. Mineta,

Secretary,

Department of Transportation,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A11821

Agency No. 5-01-5014

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency properly dismissed

complainant's consolidated complaints. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.606.

In her complaints, both dated October 24, 2000, complainant claims that

she was discriminated against in retaliation for prior EEO activity when:

The agency attempted to impede complainant's right to due process when

management did not allow the EEO Counselor to interview members of the

staff regarding complainant's informal complaint;

(a) A co-worker was allowed to scrutinize complainant's worksheets for

approximately one and one half years;

Complainant's supervisor failed to verify complainant's work prior to

giving awards;

Complainant's supervisor failed to use progressive discipline and did

not provide complainant an opportunity to correct her behavior; and

Complainant was suspended for 14 days in 1997 for the intentional

falsification of production data on her worksheets where her supervisor

did not identify on a monthly basis the items she was accused of

falsifying.

The agency dismissed claim 1 for failure to state a claim, pursuant

to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). We find that complainant's claim of

improper processing in claim 1 fails to state a claim because as a result,

complainant did not suffer a personal loss or harm to a term, condition,

or privilege of her employment. Therefore, claim 1 was properly dismissed

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

The agency dismissed claim 2 pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4),

finding that complainant had raised the matters in a negotiated grievance

procedure that permits allegations of discrimination.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.301(a) states that when a person is

employed by an agency subject to 5 U.S.C. � 7121(d) and is covered by a

collective bargaining agreement that permits allegations of discrimination

to be raised in a negotiated grievance procedure, a person wishing

to file a complaint or a grievance on a matter of alleged employment

discrimination must elect to raise the matter under either Part 1614 or

the negotiated grievance procedure, but not both. The regulation provides

that the election is indicated by the filing of a written complaint or

timely grievance, whichever is done first. The regulation also provides

that an aggrieved employee who files a grievance with an agency whose

negotiated agreement permits the acceptance of grievances which allege

discrimination may not thereafter file a complaint on the same matter

under Part 1614 irrespective of whether the agency has informed the

individual of the need to elect or whether the grievance has raised an

issue of discrimination.

We find that complainant filed a written grievance on December 3, 1997,

regarding the same matters as those raised in claims 2(a) and 2(c),

as well as claim 3, of her EEO complaint.<1> As an employee of the

Department of Transportation, complainant is employed by an agency

subject to 5 U.S.C. � 7121(d). Complainant is covered by a collective

bargaining agreement that permits allegations of discrimination to

be raised in the negotiated grievance procedure. Complainant filed a

timely grievance on December 3, 1997. Complainant filed her complaints

no earlier than October 24, 2000. Complainant first elected to file

a grievance regarding the matters raised in claims 2(a), 2(c), and 3,

of her EEO complaints. Therefore, these claims are properly dismissed

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4).

Contrary to the agency's assertion in its final decision, claim 2(b)

was not raised by complainant in her grievance. Claim 2(b) was properly

dismissed, however, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1), for stating

the same claim that is pending before or has been decided by the agency

or Commission. Complainant raised the claim articulated in claim 2(b)

in Agency Number

5-97-5105. This claim was raised in complainant's complaint dated August

14, 1997. Complainant and her representative withdrew the complaint on

July 11, 2000.

Therefore, the agency's decision dismissing complainant's complaint

is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national

organization, and not the local office, facility or department in

which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 26, 2002

__________________

Date

1Since we are dismissing claim 3 on the

ground that complainant raised the same matter in a negotiated grievance

procedure that permits allegations of discrimination, pursuant to

29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4), we will not address whether claim 3 was

properly dismissed for stating the same claim that is pending before or

has been decided by the agency or Commission, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1).