Carl R. Hord, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Capital Metro Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 3, 2009
0120092823 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 3, 2009)

0120092823

12-03-2009

Carl R. Hord, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Capital Metro Area), Agency.


Carl R. Hord,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Capital Metro Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120092823

Agency No. 4K230004809

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated June 2, 2009, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as

amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. In his complaint, complainant alleged

that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race (White)

and physical disability when from December 17, 2008 through February 9,

2009, the agency failed to accommodate his disability by refusing to

allow complainant to take his lunch break at the end of his shift or

not take a lunch break at all.

A fair reading of the complaint indicates that complainant is alleging

that the agency refused to honor the recommendations of his physician that

he be permitted to take his 30 minute lunch break at the end of his shift

or not to take a break at all as an accommodation for his disability.

In its final decision dated June 2, 2009, the agency dismissed the

matter for failure to state a claim; arguing that the issue was settled

in February 2009 through the agency's negotiated grievance process.

As such, the agency dismissed complainant's complaint in accordance

with EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). However, on appeal,

the agency concludes that the February 2009 grievance decision rendered

complainant's complaint moot and asks the Commission to affirm its

dismissal of the instant matter in accordance with EEOC Regulation 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(5).

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(5) provides for

the dismissal of a complaint when the issues raised therein are moot.

To determine whether the issues raised in complainant's complaint are

moot, the factfinder must ascertain whether (1) it can be said with

assurance that there is no reasonable expectation that the alleged

violation will recur; and (2) interim relief or events have completely

and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged discrimination.

See County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979); Kuo

v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970343 (July 10, 1998).

When such circumstances exist, no relief is available and no need for

a determination of the rights of the parties is presented.

The Commission determines that the instant complaint has not been

rendered moot because, at a minimum, complainant requested $3,500 in

compensatory damages. We have held that an agency must address the issue

of compensatory damages when the complaint presented objective evidence

that he incurred compensatory damages and that the damages were related to

the alleged discrimination. See Jackson v. United States Postal Service,

EEOC Appeal No. 01923399 (November 12, 1992); request to reopen denied,

EEOC Request No. 05930386 (February 11, 1993). Consequently, where as

here, a complainant requests compensatory damages during the processing

of a complaint, the agency is obliged to request from the complainant

objective evidence of such damages. In this case, the agency did not

request objective evidence of compensatory damages from complainant.

Should complainant prevail in his claim, the possibility of an award

of compensatory damages exists, and complainant's claim is not moot.

See Glover v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01930696

(December 6, 1993).

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is reversed. The complaint is hereby remanded to the agency

for further processing in accordance with this decision and the Order

below.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1208)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington,

DC 20013. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,

and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant.

If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil

Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 3, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120092823

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

4

0120092823