Carl I. Green, Complainant,v.Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 25, 2002
05A20297 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 25, 2002)

05A20297

07-25-2002

Carl I. Green, Complainant, v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Carl I. Green v. Department of the Army

05A20297

July 25, 2002

.

Carl I. Green,

Complainant,

v.

Thomas E. White,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Request No. 05A20297

Appeal No. 01963027

Agency No. DA 94-07-0091

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The complainant initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in Carl

I. Green v. Department of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 01963027 (March

27, 1998). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in

its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision where the

requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved

a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2)

the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

Complainant alleged he was discriminated against on the bases of sex

(male), race (Black), and in reprisal for prior protected EEO activity,

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as

amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., when he was transferred and retained

in a GS-12 position, and was assigned a voluminous workload without

recognition. The final agency decision (FAD) found no discrimination.

The Commission affirmed the FAD, finding that assuming, arguendo,

complainant established a prima facie case on all alleged bases, he

failed to show that the agency's proffered reasons for its actions were

mere pretext to mask discriminatory animus.

Complainant makes no new arguments in his request for reconsideration,

therefore, after a review of the previous decision, and the entire

record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the

criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the

Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01963027

remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further right of

administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request

for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 25, 2002

__________________

Date