Bryan T. Hawkins, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Eastern Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 20, 2011
0520110482 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 20, 2011)

0520110482

10-20-2011

Bryan T. Hawkins, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Eastern Area), Agency.




Bryan T. Hawkins,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Eastern Area),

Agency.

Request No. 0520110482

Appeal No. 0120100240

Agency No. 4C-400-0068-09

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Bryan

T. Hawkins v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120100240 (April

5, 2011). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its

discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision

where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision

involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

(2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R.

§ 1614.405(b).

In our previous decision, we affirmed the Agency’s decision dismissing

Complainant’s complaint for untimely EEO counselor contact. We noted

that the effective date of Complainant’s removal was September 6,

2008, but he did not contact a counselor until July 7, 2009, exceeding

the 45-day limitation period.

In his request for reconsideration, Complainant contends, in pertinent

part, that he was under the impression that he could not file an EEO

complaint until his union grievance was resolved.

We note that Complainant does not dispute the signed EEO Counselor's

report, noting that an EEO poster was on display at Complainant’s

facility. Complainant therefore had constructive knowledge of the

applicable time limit. See Santiago v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Request

No. 05950272 (July 6, 1995). In any event, a request for reconsideration

is not a second form of appeal. E.g., Lopez v. Dep’t of Agriculture,

EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007); EEO Management Directive

for Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), Chap. 9, §VII.A. (Nov. 9, 1999). Nothing in

Complainant’s request establishes clear error of material fact or law

in the previous decision.

After reconsidering the previous decision and the entire record,

the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of

29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to

DENY the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120100240 remains

the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative

appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

“Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and

not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 20, 2011

Date

2

0520110482

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013