Bruce Whaite, Complainant,v.Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 21, 2004
01A31913 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 21, 2004)

01A31913

01-21-2004

Bruce Whaite, Complainant, v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.


Bruce Whaite v. Social Security Administration

01A31913

January 21, 2004

.

Bruce Whaite,

Complainant,

v.

Jo Anne B. Barnhart,

Commissioner,

Social Security Administration,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A31913

Agency No. 01-0422-SSA

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts the complainant's

appeal from the agency's final decision in the above-entitled matter.

Complainant alleged that the agency had discriminated against him on

the basis of age (D.O.B. July 12, 1939) when:

(1) his supervisor (S: DOB: February 3, 1949) routinely assigns junior

analysts (and thus analysts of a younger age) broad significant projects

of greater visibility, while complainant and other older analysts<1>

were assigned smaller, sub-application projects with lesser visibility;

S refuses to advocate some of complainant's projects (e.g. artificial

intelligence for web sites) and terminates other long-term assignments

without explanation;

S attempted to force complainant to report to, and have his work reviewed

by, a lower-graded analyst;

during staff meetings, S gives prominence to the projects of the younger

analysts, while derogating the importance complainant's projects,

as well as those of other, older analysts; and

complainant and older analysts are denied recognition in the form of

performance awards, while younger analysts regularly receive performance

awards.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the agency's final decision

because the preponderance of the evidence of record does not establish

that discrimination occurred.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 21, 2004

__________________

Date

1The record shows that complainant is a Computer Specialist but the FAD

also refers to him as an analyst.