Bruce D. Rodewald, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 17, 2009
0120092554 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 17, 2009)

0120092554

09-17-2009

Bruce D. Rodewald, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Bruce D. Rodewald,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120092554

Agency No. 1E554000206

DISMISSAL

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated May 26, 2009, concerning his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

In a complaint dated January 12, 2009, complainant alleged that he

was subjected to discrimination on the bases of disability, age (61),

and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity under Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964 when in November 2008 he was issued a notice of

proposed removal and subsequently received a letter of decision effecting

his removal on December 31, 2008.

The agency accepted the complaint and investigated the matter. Thereafter,

the agency issued a final decision finding it did not discriminate against

complainant. Because complainant was a preference eligible veteran,

he was given the right to appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board

(MSPB), not the Commission. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.302(d)(3).

Instead of appealing to the MSPB, complainant sought an EEOC hearing. It

was explained to him that he had to file with the MSPB as the matter was

under MSPB's jurisdiction. Complainant then filed the instant appeal,

continuing to assert that he desires an EEOC hearing.

The Commission finds that because this is a matter within the MSPB's

jurisdiction, complainant was properly given MSPB appeal rights. To that

extent, he is not entitled to a hearing before an EEOC Administrative

Judge. Thus, if he desires to pursue the matter further, he must file

his appeal with the MSPB, as set forth in the agency's decision.

Accordingly, complainant's appeal is dismissed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 17, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120092554

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120092554